The title alone is problematic. Do not auto-makers enable kidnapping and robbery? Do not camera-makers enable child exploitation?<p>Tools don't have morality - people do. Consider that the same argument is routinely used to criticize, for example, secure chat services like Signal.<p>If you really want to protect children, just put a smart-collar on every child that records every interaction they have, and put it online for the public to review and flag things they find immoral. This will work flawlessly because everyone has the same moral judgement and interprets evidence the same way /s.<p>My tinfoil hat wonders if Meta itself is the source of this reporting. Weak attacks, like this one, help them with the strong attacks, like the fact that their product systematically harms the mental-health of young people especially. It's a bit like if RJ Reynolds funded a hit-piece on themselves that accused them of making cigarettes that can be used to burn others. Defending against <i>that</i> attack primes people to defend RJ Reynolds, which would help with the more serious, and justified, attack that they profit from addiction and lung cancer.