TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Meet Silk, The Semantic Web For The Rest Of Us

89 点作者 salar大约 13 年前

12 条评论

marcusf大约 13 年前
So this seems to be about superimposing the relational model on ad-hoc data? It seems like an idea that has been explored ad infinitum. It also seems like it's for want of a use case, in its current form.<p>Like they say in the article, the main issue they'll run in to is that people really don't want to build taxonomies manually. My skeptic prediction: Unless they get some really snappy text mining to go with the product, it'll be dead in the water. When you want to ad-hoc mine certain data sets, it's usually because you've just figured out you need some specific query answered. Having to spend several hours structuring the data before you run the actual query seems about as laborious as just doing the original work yourself. Though I might be of limited vision, or just missing something fundamental here.
评论 #3953644 未加载
lmm大约 13 年前
Seems like they're stuck on the same problems that have always killed the Semantic Web: manual metadata, and incompatible schemas. Without a solution to either, this is no different from what we had in 2003.
评论 #3953689 未加载
shabble大约 13 年前
not to be confused with Amazon Silk[1], which is the browser offloading to AWS for kindles.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Silk" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Silk</a>
评论 #3955520 未加载
iandanforth大约 13 年前
To recap, 'semantics' is the study of meaning. Humans derive meaning from linguistic symbols by comparing them to their prior experiences. The basic question being "Has this symbol, or a closely associated symbol, been present in the context of a memory I have?" If it is, then we 'understand' the symbol by pulling up the memory or memories tied to it. For most symbols (e.g. apple) there is a rich personal history or experiences we can compare it to.<p>So the mapping here is symbol -&#62; experiences, where experiences are the memories of senses over time.<p>Thus the data structure that will ultimately <i>solve</i> this problem is one that performs <i>that</i> mapping, not one which maps symbols to a necessarily arbitrary and limited other set of symbols (aka category labels and facts).
tmcw大约 13 年前
Not to be confused with Jason Rohrer's silk, which is an actually creative solution to a much more core problem, is open-source, and not driven by venture-capital segway hypewaves: <a href="http://hypertext.sourceforge.net/silk/" rel="nofollow">http://hypertext.sourceforge.net/silk/</a>
motters大约 13 年前
This doesn't look like the Semantic Web to me, it looks like a proprietary RDF silo.
评论 #3954322 未加载
wordplay大约 13 年前
They should have a tutorial that walks me through how to accomplish example project in the promo video. From what I can tell I would have to import all those prime minister pages from Wikipedia manually?<p>PS. I'm very interested in the ideas behind the semantic web, and the video hints that Silk may have gotten closer than anyone else at successfully "building the human" into the software design. IMO it's all about removing friction and I see some promising ideas in that regard, so congrats to Silk for that!
username3大约 13 年前
How does Silk compare to Freebase?
评论 #3953968 未加载
maaku大约 13 年前
This sounds exactly like DEVONthink, reframed as "semantic web":<p><a href="http://www.devontechnologies.com/products/devonthink/overview.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.devontechnologies.com/products/devonthink/overvie...</a>
chintan大约 13 年前
It is not clear if this is really a Semantic Web app<p>1. Does it allow OWL/RDF import/exports? Can I bring in my "linked data" schemas into Silk?<p>2. Is there any ontology reasoning support in search?
评论 #3954916 未加载
评论 #3954334 未加载
uses大约 13 年前
Maybe they could start by importing, categorizing, and structuring the entirety of Wikipedia. That would be a good tech demo.
评论 #3956359 未加载
drumdance大约 13 年前
How is this different from microformats?
评论 #3953601 未加载