TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mojeek

19 点作者 hboon大约 1 年前

3 条评论

h4ch1大约 1 年前
I don&#x27;t have a comprehensive test suite for seeing how search engines perform but I use some random programming terms to see how well it avoids SEO&#x2F;AdWords boosted content.<p>Searched for radix sort -<p>Mojeek:<p>1. Wikipedia (as it should be)<p>2,3. Stackexchange implementation specific questions<p>rest: quality blogs, pure text tutorials<p>Google:<p>1. GeeksForGeeks<p>2. Wikipedia (seriously?)<p>3-10. all &quot;blogs&quot; that churn out the same content as geeksforgeeks (progamiz, javatpoint, tutorialspoint, etc)<p>DDG: Nearly an identical copy to Google&#x27;s result<p>Personally, I&#x27;d prefer Mojeek to the Google&#x2F;DDG results any day.<p>Will keep trying with complex queries, errors to have a better idea of how it performs, but still great work!
TriangleEdge大约 1 年前
What&#x27;s the competitive advantage compared to DDG? Why will this continue existing?
评论 #39547455 未加载
评论 #39547137 未加载
audiodude大约 1 年前
If you&#x27;re looking for alternative search, I have to mention Kagi (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kagi.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kagi.com&#x2F;</a>). Not free, but totally worth it to filter out results like geeksforgeeks, tutorialspoint, w3schools etc.
评论 #39547613 未加载