TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Singapore Airlines Concorde

230 点作者 qsi大约 1 年前

7 条评论

delta_p_delta_x大约 1 年前
&gt; Flight times between Singapore and London would be cut from 18 hours on conventional aircraft at the time to just 10 hours.<p>This is very interesting, because current Singapore-Heathrow direct flights are around 13 hours. I wouldn&#x27;t pay first-class++ fares for a 3-hour flight time reduction in a tiny, cramped cabin with worse pressurisation and ventilation than first class on modern A380s, B777s and A350s that currently ply the route.
评论 #39590542 未加载
评论 #39592320 未加载
评论 #39601404 未加载
评论 #39592758 未加载
gumby大约 1 年前
I was surprised that SQ was the only third party airline to have its livery on Concorde, as I saw plenty of pictures of Concordes with Braniff livery on on side.<p>Well, I did remember correctly that the service operated from Dallas (to NY or Washington). Subsonic only, and with lots of crazy adaptation to fit the crazy laws, like changing the aircraft registration number on each flight.<p>But all those pictures I saw were advertising drawings: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.heritageconcorde.com&#x2F;braniff-airways-concorde-operations" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.heritageconcorde.com&#x2F;braniff-airways-concorde-op...</a>
评论 #39594221 未加载
评论 #39592362 未加载
评论 #39592479 未加载
zabzonk大约 1 年前
i loved concorde. i can remember them flying over my flat in south east london on their approach to heathrow in the early 1980s. beautiful.
评论 #39591673 未加载
评论 #39589584 未加载
simonbarker87大约 1 年前
Concorde’s failure makes me very sad. I understand that the economics didn’t stack up but it feels like we’ve given up trying to reach for the space age style future envisaged 70 years ago and instead are settling for “the same but a fraction nicer or a bit cheaper” in many areas.
评论 #39590157 未加载
评论 #39589394 未加载
评论 #39590039 未加载
评论 #39591870 未加载
评论 #39590289 未加载
评论 #39589390 未加载
评论 #39589250 未加载
SergeAx大约 1 年前
&gt; most popular supersonic passenger airliner<p>I don&#x27;t understand this passage. There were only two supersonic passenger airliners, and Tupolev 144 was obviously off limits for Singapore Airlines. Is it LLM writing?
brcmthrowaway大约 1 年前
How fast would Boom aero do LDN-Singapore?
评论 #39596574 未加载
laborcontract大约 1 年前
This should be labeled (2021), as evidenced by the comments. This blog is doing a weird thing where it&#x27;s re-dating old posts to today, presumably to try to trick Google into thinking that it&#x27;s fresh content, for SEO purposes.
评论 #39589362 未加载