Wow, there is a lot to unpack here. Overall an unrealistic perspective in my opinion. Which international laws should be enforced here and by whom?<p>Certainly a two state solution is as far away as it ever has been, but a one state solution is even further behind by magnitudes.<p>> Advocates of a renewed push for a two-state solution will claim that it is the most realistic option.<p>Because that is the reality. The blame towards Israel here is just again a typical and an uneducated position.<p>The US has among the highest credibility in this conflict. Otherwise there would be countries working constructively here, but there was only silence.<p>The "global south" doesn't exist, it is a fantasy construct. This is just insurance against a hegemony, but there is not much common ground for anything.<p>Which country has more credibility according to the authors?<p>You also don't hand people a country when they started a war and were repelled. This would lead to further aggression, it is just beyond reasonable.<p>Also, why trust any country in that region? There are a few, but they didn't really shine with support for a Palestinian state. They would probably tasks Israel with providing security from such a state.<p>The problem is the indoctrination of the youth. I don't know if you can correct that. The first step would be to stop that immediately. And frankly, this article might even give munition to said indoctrination.