TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Earliest forest discovered, scientists say

53 点作者 The-Old-Hacker大约 1 年前

5 条评论

JoeAltmaier大约 1 年前
Interesting, but on the wobbly side of science.<p>Trees are usually defined to be something very different from cycads and palms. Today if these were growing, they wouldn&#x27;t be called trees, and their cluster not called forests.<p>And second, similarly to how &#x27;there&#x27;s no such thing as a fish&#x27;, it&#x27;s been postulated that there&#x27;s no such thing as a tree. Many different life-forms that we call trees, have no known common ancestor.<p>Make of that what you will.
评论 #39654389 未加载
评论 #39654463 未加载
评论 #39654437 未加载
评论 #39656175 未加载
jmclnx大约 1 年前
Interesting it was in the UK, I was expecting Australia or Quebec where I think geological finds tend to be much older.
评论 #39653085 未加载
8A51C大约 1 年前
Coincidently, they also discovered &#x27;living fossils&#x27; amongst the entertainment acts at Butlins Minehead. Some were said to rival the tree fossils in age.
tuatoru大约 1 年前
Rugose and squamous.
INTPenis大约 1 年前
.., scientists say. has to be my favorite suffix to any headline.