TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Gemini won't return C++ coding help if you're under 18 "to preserve your safety"

63 点作者 g42gregory大约 1 年前

19 条评论

dragonwriter大约 1 年前
Gemini seems to be a sterling example of what happens when you don&#x27;t take any AI safety (in any definition) seriously as a substantive thing, but <i>do</i> take presenting an image of AI safety as a &quot;we have to do this&quot; checklist item.
评论 #39633915 未加载
basil-rash大约 1 年前
Dupe of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39583473">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39583473</a>. My explanation from before: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39584152">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39584152</a>
morbicer大约 1 年前
LoL that&#x27;s like cigarettes in New Zealand, too dangerous for the younguns, better stick to memory safe languages.
评论 #39633990 未加载
elzbardico大约 1 年前
It is a plan to make C++ popular among teenagers.
jug大约 1 年前
I much prefer Claude 3 or even ChatGPT guardrails over Gemini. Gemini feels kind of powerful and then it does the most egregious things like this or hilarious imagegen of those black nazis as if they hammered it into the system prompt, bad code generation worse than last year&#x27;s free Microsoft Copilot etc. it&#x27;s like there is something surprisingly poor seeping through cracks. Weird model. I think it&#x27;s simply not that hot and their system prompts shine through as the LLM doesn&#x27;t quite &quot;get&quot; the intent and nuances. Gemini probably benefits tremendously from running uncensored. I hope all this is because Gemini 1.0 was something they wanted to get out the door urgently to replace Bard that couldn&#x27;t even compete with GPT 3.5.
dkjaudyeqooe大约 1 年前
Finally Gemini gets something right.<p>&quot;This is your child&#x27;s brain on C++&quot;...
klyrs大约 1 年前
The AI safety we deserve
speedylight大约 1 年前
Tell them to use typescript instead. It is a safe language after all
nurumaik大约 1 年前
I wonder if that&#x27;s because gemini thinks C++20(standard where concepts were introduced) is 20+
评论 #39633761 未加载
Grazester大约 1 年前
Would it return Rust code though? We have been told that C++ is dangerous
评论 #39633680 未加载
mypalmike大约 1 年前
No amount of engineering will stop generative AI from spitting out quirky or problematic results under some conditions. At best, a majority of responses will be considered reasonable by a majority of people. We&#x27;re probably close to meeting that criteria now, despite some highly publicized outliers.
评论 #39634158 未加载
starbugs大约 1 年前
Simple solution: Don&#x27;t use Gemini.
OrvalWintermute大约 1 年前
I too, agree that we should keep minors away from C++<p>:)
评论 #39633953 未加载
评论 #39634016 未加载
评论 #39633997 未加载
steve1977大约 1 年前
&quot;Well kid, you know, I started with C++ when I was your age... in hindsight, it was obviously stupid, but we didn&#x27;t know any better back then and it wasn&#x27;t forbidden yet...&quot;
cyberax大约 1 年前
What next? A government-mandated license to use C++? And what next, licenses to write OS drivers?<p>On the second thought, as a C++ programmer, I might even approve of it.
yieldcrv大约 1 年前
Mooooom someone added &quot;diverse&quot; to the system prompt again
gedy大约 1 年前
What on Earth has Google done to themselves. Is there an HR-like AI Safety bureaucracy that has inserted themselves in the org? Or is this top down what they want?
评论 #39633889 未加载
评论 #39634913 未加载
评论 #39634103 未加载
bdw5204大约 1 年前
Gemini seems to be very far from ready for a public release. Google would have been better off delaying it until it didn&#x27;t have tons of embarrassing bugs, many of which have been turned into &quot;evidence&quot; for conspiracy theories.
abdulhaq大约 1 年前
Dykstra would agree with this