TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Killer drones pioneered in Ukraine are the weapons of the future

34 点作者 giuliomagnifico大约 1 年前

6 条评论

btbuildem大约 1 年前
&gt; a shift towards small, cheap and disposable weapons; the increasing use of consumer technology; and the drift towards autonomy in battle<p>I&#x27;ve been following this with some trepidation. It&#x27;s incredible how accessible this technology is. Right now jamming seems to be the best defence, but how long before target recognition works well enough on these low-power chipsets?<p>A bad actor can send out a swarm of a few dozen; it doesn&#x27;t matter if your flak cannons take down 80%, the few that get through still do serious damage.<p>Good luck to the Secret Service and the security detail of various excessively wealthy individuals.
imacomputer大约 1 年前
Small FPV quadcopters are terrifying in war.<p>If you haven&#x27;t seen it yet, go checkout whats on r&#x2F;CombatFootage, its essentially killbots that follow soldiers around and explode on contact or drop grenades. I think this is a future of warfare which we are not talking about enough. If the Ukraine is able to make these effectively with consumer technology, unfortunately everyone can, including criminals looking to make hits.<p>I could see this fall out in a few ways:<p>- Operating personal drones and other small craft will (and should) become restrictive, if not outright prohibited outside of designated areas. All commercial drones outside of these areas will have to have squawk their position and registration.<p>- Eventually radio jammers will not be effective countermeasures against these weapons. Machine vision, and a simple AI which could be crammed into a SoM (e.g. IoT AI products), lock onto targets and follow them into areas with radio jammers.<p>- Anyone who needs security protection will probably be spending a lot more time indoors including events.
kurthr大约 1 年前
The article isn&#x27;t much longer than the taster:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20240208152121&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;leaders&#x2F;2024&#x2F;02&#x2F;08&#x2F;killer-drones-pioneered-in-ukraine-are-the-weapons-of-the-future" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20240208152121&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.econo...</a>
woleium大约 1 年前
Also see this future fiction short film from 2017<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;TlO2gcs1YvM?si=KsN2G1LwmNTUtFLh" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;TlO2gcs1YvM?si=KsN2G1LwmNTUtFLh</a>
评论 #39654557 未加载
wizerdrobe大约 1 年前
Something I’ve wondered throughout the conflict, when and why did the US shift to a focus of techno-supremacy?<p>Seemingly, our strategy in the WWII was to invest in technology where possible but at the same time throwing many trucks and jeeps and puny Sherman tanks and guns and bandages and bullets and beans at the problem as possible.<p>Whereas in modern America we seem so much a “wonder weapons” mindset? That seems a poor posture in light of the article, all those expensive weapons will become a burden to protect or just outright destroyed.
评论 #39652929 未加载
评论 #39652920 未加载
评论 #39658546 未加载
评论 #39655369 未加载
评论 #39654170 未加载
评论 #39654213 未加载
thriftwy大约 1 年前
Most consumer grade drones are too expensive for one-time FPV drone. They&#x27;re usually built from kits.
评论 #39653301 未加载