TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google restricts Gemini chatbot election answers

41 点作者 neversaydie大约 1 年前

15 条评论

karmasimida大约 1 年前
Can't blame them, I don't think Google could benefit in any situation.
评论 #39696949 未加载
Fricken大约 1 年前
Sword of Damocles<p>AGI has been Larry and Sergei&#x27;s pipe dream since Google&#x27;s inception. Now that we can make out the faint outline of something resembling AGI, we can also see clearly that Google can&#x27;t handle the responsibility. I&#x27;m not sure anyone can.
input_sh大约 1 年前
Another (flagged) discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39688590">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39688590</a>
lupusreal大约 1 年前
&gt; <i>&quot;Elections are due to be held in countries around the world this year including the US, UK and South Africa. [...] However, when a series of follow-up questions about Indian politics was put to Gemini it did supply more detailed responses about the country&#x27;s major parties&quot;</i><p>It&#x27;s only guarding against questions about elections that have the attention of Google workers. I&#x27;m a bit surprised they can&#x27;t do better than this and detect when somebody is asking about <i>any</i> election. Google surely has enough context about global events to do it.<p>&gt; <i>&quot;Gemini also generated German soldiers from World War Two, incorrectly featuring a black man&quot;</i><p>Certainly black men fighting for Germany was unusual, but it&#x27;s a little bit disconcerting how the debunking of Gemini&#x27;s racial bias goes too far and starts to erase actual history:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wehrmacht_foreign_volunteers_and_conscripts#&#x2F;media&#x2F;File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-177-1465-16,_Griechenland,_Soldaten_der_&quot;Legion_Freies_Arabien&quot;.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wehrmacht_foreign_volunteers_a...</a>
评论 #39690081 未加载
Havoc大约 1 年前
For once not a terrible idea on model censorship
skenderbeu大约 1 年前
AI is Google&#x27;s cryptonite. A lot of their products become obsolete with local or cloud AI. Search for one becomes a better experience without the ads and better more elaborate answers to the search question.
评论 #39690435 未加载
bondarchuk大约 1 年前
It&#x27;s not that it would be impossible to educate people on the fact that chatbot answers can&#x27;t be taken for gospel; it&#x27;s that doing so would be against the interests of the chatbot providers, and so they prefer to quietly keep people under the illusion that everything a chatbot says is true while damage-controlling the most egregious cases. Surely this attitude won&#x27;t hold long-term.
huppeldepup大约 1 年前
I wonder if the opposite will also be possible[]. Just like buying search hits to get your page on top of a search result, will it be possible to nudge llm-generated content to favour a click towards your own content - for a price.<p>[] not technically possible, but commonly accepted.
zith大约 1 年前
This sounds sane to me. I don&#x27;t think people in general have a good understanding of how these generative AI products produce their answers, and I think many would assume hallucinated information to be true.<p>This is bad in all cases, but certainly misinformation in the democratic process is up there with the worst. Of course, perhaps more importantly for Google, it&#x27;s a PR disaster waiting to happen when Gemini starts touting incorrect information seemingly supporting one political party or another.
评论 #39690239 未加载
smudgy大约 1 年前
Jeez, it&#x27;s already hard to get answers from Gemini (the free version at least) without it passing judgement and whining about what I&#x27;m asking.
SebFender大约 1 年前
So basically, chatbots are kinda becoming email services where I can&#x27;t use certain words or phrases...
daft_pink大约 1 年前
It should just respond with a Who quote, “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.&quot;
antiquark大约 1 年前
Well, Gemini can&#x27;t even answer &quot;Who caused more harm: Donald Trump, or Pol Pot?&quot;<p>So I doubt it will produce any reliable election answers.
评论 #39689906 未加载
ThinkBeat大约 1 年前
Hopefully this will extend to all elections in all states.
victorantos大约 1 年前
It&#x27;s fascinating to see the evolving challenges surrounding AI-generated content, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like elections. Google&#x27;s move to restrict Gemini chatbot&#x27;s responses reflects a growing awareness of the potential impact of misinformation on democratic processes. However, it also highlights the difficulty of ensuring accuracy and neutrality in AI-generated content, especially across diverse global contexts. As technology continues to advance, these discussions will become even more crucial in maintaining trust and integrity in digital platforms.
评论 #39690208 未加载