Judge rules Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto

&gt; &quot;Dr. Wright has been shown to have lied on an extraordinary scale. […] He has invented an entire biographical history, producing one tranche after another of forged documents to support it.&quot;<p>Ouch. He has been shown to be a high-output fabulist, as everyone suspected.

One simple way of proving that he is - by signing a message using the private key of one of the addresses to recieve Bitcoin close to the blockchain&#x27;s genesis.

I doubt this will end his cult following, as the dead comments in this very thread will demonstrate.

I don’t understand why courts even entertain this guy<p>Shouldn’t he have been locked up for contempt and perjury like 100 times for this stunt?<p>Shouldn’t his pathological lying gotten cases dismissed, or himself committed into an institution involuntarily?

The evidence for Adam Back being Satoshi Nakamoto is pretty damning. Notably, he developed Hashcash which was the predecessor technology, has a mysterious gap in published papers during the period of bitcoins development, was heavily involved in the cypherpunk scene, and founded&#x2F;runs the company Blockstream which does a large amount of development work on Bitcoin core.

&quot;Please cease your search for me.&quot; - S. Nakamoto, 2010

Of course he isn’t. When will he go to jail for wasting everyone’s time with this crap and committing perjury?

&quot;I&#x27;m not surprised&quot; -Satoshi Nakamoto

The galaxy brain take is that Craig Wright actually is Satoshi Nakamoto and his inept attempts to prove his identity is merely another layer of op-sec. After this ruling anyone who even attempts to reveal his true identity will be dismissed and ridiculed.