TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mercedes is trialing humanoid robots for 'low skill, repetitive' tasks

33 点作者 distalx大约 1 年前

11 条评论

Cthulhu_大约 1 年前
Low skill, but higher skill than the automation already in place it seems; it says &quot;like having Apollo inspect and deliver components to human production line workers&quot;, but there&#x27;s less expensive and more reliable ways to do that - like conveyor belts and whatnot.<p>Call me a luddite but it looks like an overly error prone solution looking for a problem to me.
评论 #39721117 未加载
评论 #39721145 未加载
评论 #39720938 未加载
评论 #39721242 未加载
评论 #39721248 未加载
评论 #39721017 未加载
rightbyte大约 1 年前
Wouldn&#x27;t wheeled robots be better for flat factory floors, if it is supposed to deliver parts? What is the point of the legs.<p>&quot;Mercedes has started trialing an undisclosed number of Apollo robots at a factory in Hungary. The country has experienced labor shortages for several years as workers migrate to Western Europe, with Audi and Mercedes having both expressed concerns regarding labor supply in 2016.&quot;<p>Raise wages?
评论 #39720895 未加载
评论 #39720995 未加载
评论 #39721103 未加载
评论 #39720819 未加载
评论 #39720834 未加载
lp4vn大约 1 年前
I think that at some point AI will enter the domain of repetitive physical jobs, like for example an experienced butcher will train an AI arm that eventually will learn to slice meat correctly since that&#x27;s an activity that normally works with a reasonably standardized product(the animal carcass).<p>Keeping that in mind, honestly for me it&#x27;s hard not to be very skeptical that it would make any economic sense in the next many decades to have an expensive humanoid robot performing tasks with a very low aggregated value like moving boxes one by one. Just because it&#x27;s a robot performing an economic activity it doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean it will be productive or competitive.
评论 #39721752 未加载
Ekaros大约 1 年前
Delivering parts? Humanoid carrying single box feels like massive waste. Throw something pallet sized maybe 1,5m high or even higher that has simple mechanics to drop a box and move multiple of boxes. And then make it move multiple boxes at time...
评论 #39720800 未加载
bpiche大约 1 年前
I think Mercedes built expensive humanoid body doubles in Gibson’s “The Peripheral”? Gonna be interested to see if his predictions come true again
qgin大约 1 年前
Mercedes has really been a dark horse in autonomous tech. First a commercially available level-3 driving system, now this
评论 #39721047 未加载
评论 #39720923 未加载
robotburrito大约 1 年前
I wonder what happens if your consumer base has all had their incomes replaced by AI? Who buys your product your now making with it? Does AI just lead to the end of capitalism as we know it?
评论 #39721259 未加载
评论 #39721235 未加载
评论 #39721182 未加载
评论 #39721183 未加载
donmcronald大约 1 年前
I bet that robot is amazing at walking down the golden path.
ximeng大约 1 年前
Almost any article on automation has a sentence about freeing highly skilled workers for more valuable tasks. Along with the talk of tight labour supply it comes across as disingenuous when the value is replacing the cost of low skill workers.
评论 #39720931 未加载
Solvency大约 1 年前
I&#x27;ll never understand this fascination with humanoid robots. It smacks of our innate narcissism, which lead to hilariously ironic and pervasive belief systems like &quot;God made MAN in HIS image!&quot; (surely not the other way around!)<p>Meanwhile the whole world already operates on incredibly precise high-tolerance robots doing low skill and repetitive tasks as well as extremely &quot;high skill&quot; tasks like painting&#x2F;manufacturing cars or milling metal.<p>And we have wheeled robots like Autostore.com for other automation tasks.<p>A humanoid robot exists only to tickle our perverse self-centric obsessions, and namely: news sites, news consumers, and executives.
评论 #39720871 未加载
评论 #39720814 未加载
评论 #39721043 未加载
karaterobot大约 1 年前
Cool, now we just need to continually redefine &quot;low skill&quot; as whatever AI and robots are capable of doing, and we&#x27;ve got an all-purpose justification for laying people off.<p>Step 3 is &quot;profit!&quot;. While step 4 may be &quot;widespread suffering and social unrest&quot;, we can just redefine our process as ending at step 3, and it&#x27;s no big deal.<p>All problems can be solved by taking the right perspective!
评论 #39721204 未加载
评论 #39721160 未加载