TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Win against Facebook. Giant not allowed to censor content at will

24 点作者 throw_a_grenade大约 1 年前

5 条评论

panarky大约 1 年前
The blocked material was related to harm reduction related to illegal drug use.<p>There&#x27;s a strong possibility that some harm reduction discussions could be interpreted as promoting illegal drug use, especially within the context of Facebook&#x27;s rules.<p>Harm reduction strategies aim to minimize the negative consequences of drug use without necessarily promoting abstinence. This means providing information like:<p>- Safer injection practices<p>- How to recognize and respond to an overdose<p>- Drug interactions and testing<p>- Detailed instruction on drug acquisition, drug usage techniques, supplies and equipment<p>Facebook&#x27;s rules on drug-related content are designed to prevent the sale or promotion of illegal substances. These policies might be too broad, leading to the removal of legitimate harm reduction information.<p>And some advocates of illegal drug use sometimes communicate in the language of harm reduction, which can make it very difficult for a moderator to distinguish what material follows the rules and what material does not.
评论 #39733063 未加载
mminer237大约 1 年前
A website isn&#x27;t allowed to prohibit discussion of doing illegal drugs on it?<p>This feels like a bad decision. Is the complaint just that Facebook didn&#x27;t say specifically that the ban was because the page was promoting drugs? It sounds like it would have been legal if they were just more specific about the why?<p>If that&#x27;s the case, it feels like a waste of everyone&#x27;s time when the reasoning is obvious. If that&#x27;s not the case, it&#x27;s horrific to think that Poland has some law requiring sites to host any discussion. That would just turn every site into 4chan, and I would sooner ban Poland than ban having rules.
评论 #39733052 未加载
olix0r大约 1 年前
… in Poland.
throw_a_grenade大约 1 年前
Facebook lost a case about moderation before the Civil Court in Poland (first instance). The court found out:<p>- by blocking fanpages FB infringed on personal&#x2F;moral rights of the organisation owning the fanpage<p>- agreement in FB&#x27;s ToS to file any case in Irish Court is null and void even in case of organisation, and not consumer<p>- the case can be held in Poland and in Polish language (FB has Polish version, so they should be able to defend in Polish)<p>- FB is not allowed to block without justification and a way to contest the block<p>- FB&#x2F;Meta needs to restore full page with likes, shares, follows etc<p>- FB&#x2F;Meta is to post apology for their behaviour on the fanpage in question<p>The case started in 2018 or 2019. During the case court imposed interim measure reinstating the page and forbidding FB from removing it.<p>(I&#x27;m repasting this comment from previous Polish language submission, which didn&#x27;t take off: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39701174">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=39701174</a>)
评论 #39722345 未加载
tazu大约 1 年前
Saw this at the top of HN for seconds and it just got completely wiped. What&#x27;s going on there?
评论 #39721831 未加载
评论 #39722046 未加载