TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A Theory Of Productive Spaces

51 点作者 shepbook大约 13 年前

9 条评论

brudgers大约 13 年前
Spaces are most productive when there is interesting meaningful work to be performed and better locations for engaging in distracting behaviors.<p>The library doesn't work because of its configuration, it works because the occupants are self selecting. People who want to party go to a bar, instead.<p>It works because there are lots of areas with different levels of privacy and which tolerate different levels of social interaction, from the carrell in the stacks, to the pairs of lounge chairs by the window, to the reading room, or these days, perhaps a snack bar. Importantly, the occupants of each of these areas are again self selecting.<p>Finally, library spaces tend to be the commons. Permanent territoriality is discouraged, and this furthers self selection.
superuser2大约 13 年前
The library analogy is spot on. I can't proclaim to know professional workspaces, but as a student, it's <i>incredible</i> how much more productive I am in a university library than alone in my own bedroom.<p>There's something about the hushed, low, but unmistakable <i>presence</i> of serious people in a grand room built and utilized for grand purposes. How could you resent working in a space like this?<p><a href="http://harperlibrarycommons.uchicago.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://harperlibrarycommons.uchicago.edu/</a>
akg大约 13 年前
Reminds me of my previous (BigCorp) employer who spent millions on redesigning office spaces from individual offices to a network for cube-farms. These were expensive cubes too, because you could move them around and orient them in different configuration to enhance team collaboration. Of course, in reality, no one bothered to move heavy walls around when they could just walk over. Also management, didn't let people organically disperse, instead they assigned cubes to people in the most inefficient configuration possible.<p>You should have written this a few years ago. ;-)
评论 #3973038 未加载
ken大约 13 年前
The library example is an interesting one to me, because my personal productivity in libraries varies drastically depending on the layout.<p>In college, the libraries where I ended up reading and working were impressively tight, vertical, and often almost claustrophobic [1]. Carrels aren't offices, but the ones I used practically were: there were always walls of books all around each one. The libraries also had big open rooms (similar to the pretty U of Chicago photo superuser2 linked to), and I tried working there a couple times, but even to go into those spaces was supremely uncomfortable for me. It wasn't noise: even if there wasn't a soul in the whole library, I wouldn't go there.<p>I recently quit my job because they moved to an 'open floor plan'. I just don't think I'm wired to work in flat open spaces. Right now I'm working from home, and though my apartment isn't big, somehow I naturally ended up with walls and (medium-to-tall) furniture surrounding me on 3.5 sides, less than an arm's length in each direction.<p>[1]: <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CjyKC0qYp78/TaZz0lPFUyI/AAAAAAAAANU/jvbN1e7qYlM/s1600/UrisLibrary.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CjyKC0qYp78/TaZz0lPFUyI/AAAAAAAAAN...</a> -- other carrels were even more isolated, but not as photogenic.
swedenborg大约 13 年前
"I’ve been thinking about what an optimized collaborative space would look like. "<p>Jung : <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscious" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscious</a><p>When we lose ourself in some total focus, we seem to be happy and productive, some explain it with by dropping the individual self We transcend into a zen state ...
snambi大约 13 年前
Very thoughtful post. Many big companies are moving towards "open floor" plan. But, when you look closer, it is simply smaller cubicles and more people in the same space. But this blog provides the insight, how to improve "productivity" by having conscious 60/40 split. I think this is a great insight.
adamio大约 13 年前
Responding to the first paragraph of the article, groups can create innovative off-the-wall ideas without solitude, that's how improv comedy works. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improvisational_theatre" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improvisational_theatre</a>
waivej大约 13 年前
Nice article. Years ago I liked "Peopleware" enough that I got my boss to buy a copy for each person in the department.
评论 #3973050 未加载
zxcdw大约 13 年前
"Think back to the time when you’ve done your best work."<p>I found this very good advice. :)