TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Future of the Monetary System [pdf]

59 点作者 vikrum大约 1 年前

3 条评论

sedev大约 1 年前
From the Conclusions section:<p>&gt; The main question we tried to answer is whether a significant shift away from the US dollar as the dominant “hegemonic” currency is likely to occur in the foreseeable future, and in which direction the monetary system might develop. The key conclusion was that the fate of the US dollar as the currency hegemon depends on a number of factors, with the degree to which US policy makers would be able to maintain macroeconomic stability relative to other countries of supreme importance. Only if stability is maintained will the US dollar retain its position as the safe-haven currency of choice.<p>In heavily hedged terms, they conclude that the situation is currently stable and likely to remain so. My opinion is that there&#x27;s good information in this document but the editing (mostly in the sense of structure and clarity) is quite poor, prone to using the very real complexity of the issues at hand as an excuse for weasel words, wishy-washiness, and desperation to please one&#x27;s boss. In reading this document, I recommend that you keep in mind that the document is from late 2022 and Credit Suisse imploded in early 2023, so, as the document&#x27;s authors might say, one suspects that it does not represent a level of intellectual rigor that one would prefer to see from a globally important bank.
评论 #39729377 未加载
fHr大约 1 年前
Some overengineered paper from January 23. It is 2024 and there is no more cs. I wouldn&#x27;t take this serious, the bank that published it couldn&#x27;t even survive 23. No risk management whatsoever.
bankerasexample大约 1 年前
For those who are claiming they should dismiss this paper because it was written by Credit Suisse (who have collapsed), I will weigh in as someone who works in a bank. The people who wrote this would have had absolutely nothing to do with the banks risk management or corporate decision making, and so exist more or less orthogonally from the people who caused its collapse. This is doubly true given European regulation which requires segregation of business lines within the bank: you even see the report is produced by ‘credit suisse research institute’ which will produce+sell research separately from the risk taking parts of the business. Not saying it’s correct&#x2F;not prone to groupthink but the people writing will be some of the top economists&#x2F;research analysts out there.