TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What's the highest-quality of writing on the web?

3 点作者 blackbrokkoli大约 1 年前
I&#x27;m looking for excellent writing on the internet, as inspiration to improve my own writing. Form, content, topic or politics are secondary.<p>What do you recommend? Ideally freely accessible.

1 comment

nonrandomstring大约 1 年前
It&#x27;s an interesting question because I am not sure that &quot;good writing&quot; can be separated from content subject matter.<p>George Orwell&#x27;s &quot;Politics and the English Language&quot; is a the standard reading advice in this context [0].<p>However, in many ways it is outdated, though it still resonates because we all dislike gaseous bloviators. The quality is inseparable;e from the message.<p>So consider this [1] reply to a commenter yesterday.<p>Giving the strongest interpretation and assuming the commenter was writing in good faith, s&#x2F;he <i>experienced</i> what is by all reasonable standards &quot;a good essay&quot; as awful, seemingly because they bitterly disagree with the message.<p>Therefore, I don&#x27;t think one can ordinarily experience prose in isolation as &quot;good&quot;, even if technically faultless. The message is part of the reading experience.<p>The contrary also applies. I&#x27;ll be down-voted to hell for saying it [2] but I personally find Paul Graham (who writes here frequently) as rather anodyne in style. The topics he chooses are interesting however little is ventured in colour.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.orwellfoundation.com&#x2F;the-orwell-foundation&#x2F;orwell&#x2F;essays-and-other-works&#x2F;politics-and-the-english-language&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.orwellfoundation.com&#x2F;the-orwell-foundation&#x2F;orwel...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;context?id=39737184">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;context?id=39737184</a><p>[2] which might prove my point that acceptability of message trumps all other qualities in the experience of reading.