TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to Start Google

737 点作者 harscoat大约 1 年前

81 条评论

codethatwerks大约 1 年前
What is the parallel advice for a 40 year old? I guess the programming and tinkering stuff still applies. But university cannot be redone. Sure I can study but I wont have any connection to most young people. I’ll be the old guy. And this assumes I can afford the loss of income.<p>I assume a lot of start ups are started by older people too.<p>I think for older people an advantage is to solve older people problems. Like how sucky accessing all kinds of “adulting” things are from aged care to dealing with myriad systems with kids schools or any other problems that have inevitably been chucked at you. Some of these “startups” might actually be lobbying&#x2F;political work for the good that doesn’t make money, some might be startups.<p>Also being older I don’t care about making a unicorn. I see that as an odd goal for a founder of any age but a great goal for an investor.
评论 #39761449 未加载
评论 #39762476 未加载
评论 #39762321 未加载
评论 #39762263 未加载
评论 #39763539 未加载
评论 #39761552 未加载
评论 #39762231 未加载
评论 #39765923 未加载
评论 #39761363 未加载
评论 #39762541 未加载
评论 #39763355 未加载
YossarianFrPrez大约 1 年前
PG is remarkably consistent in his advice; much of his writing is about developing a nose for &quot;what&#x27;s missing&quot; and having the chops and resources to attempt a solution.<p>Also, I think &#x27;Google&#x27; in this instance is more for motivation rather than a literal comparison. He&#x27;s leaving out the part that Google was founded by graduate CS students a) looking for a thesis, b) into node-link graphs, and c) inspired by academic citation metrics. Would PG advise anyone to go to grad school to learn how to find scientific-discovery-based startup ideas these days?
评论 #39757860 未加载
评论 #39761231 未加载
评论 #39759489 未加载
评论 #39757761 未加载
评论 #39760585 未加载
评论 #39759859 未加载
Animats大约 1 年前
1. Get into Stanford just as Stanford is getting into the VC business.<p>2. Use Stanford bandwidth for your web crawler.<p>3. See how AltaVista does it; they&#x27;re in downtown Palo Alto.<p>4. Get 100K from the guy who founded Sun.<p>5. Move into the space above the bike shop in Palo Alto. (9 major startups began there.)<p>6. Get more funding from the guy who founded Amazon.<p>7. Sell search ads.<p>8. Profit!
评论 #39761235 未加载
评论 #39763910 未加载
评论 #39762676 未加载
评论 #39761275 未加载
difflens大约 1 年前
It&#x27;s interesting that this piece mentions &quot;to get really rich&quot; as one of the primary motivators. Especially to high school students. I wonder if that&#x27;s good advice or if society is better served by motivating students to start companies that make the world better.
评论 #39761144 未加载
评论 #39762382 未加载
评论 #39762497 未加载
necovek大约 1 年前
I don&#x27;t see any mention of being ready to completely pivot from your original, lofty mission (&quot;best search with no ads&quot;) to exactly the opposite (&quot;ads are money&quot;).<p>Google was a successful, unsustainable search engine before it was a successful business.<p>Facebook was a successful social network waay before it was a successful business.<p>Reddit was... You can see where I am going with this.
评论 #39763245 未加载
评论 #39763363 未加载
CPLX大约 1 年前
He left out the part about starting your company at a unique point in history where a generational technology shift was taking place that <i>also</i> happens to be a time when antitrust laws had recently been enforced (making your main competitor wary) but were about to be completely ignored for the next 20 years, so you could exploit your initial market position and engage in anti-competitive behavior to grow huge.
评论 #39757038 未加载
dools大约 1 年前
YMMV<p>The happiest entrepreneurs I know got advanced degrees, had a solid career, developed plenty of contacts, then launched something in their 30s or 40s with substantially less risk than taking a punt on knowing what problems were worth solving while at University, or taking a punt on finding the right person to start a company with while at University, or taking a punt on having the wide range of skills required to actually make a company work without ever having any work experience.<p>This is the sort of hype that drew me in when I was younger and I think it&#x27;s damaging. The real way to start Google is to be smart, hard working and incredibly lucky. IMHO the best way to start a company is to be smart, hard working and patient.
评论 #39763298 未加载
评论 #39762895 未加载
评论 #39762649 未加载
评论 #39762522 未加载
codelord大约 1 年前
How to start Google? You can&#x27;t. That holds for 99.999999% of the people. The rest 0.000001% aren&#x27;t wasting their time reading Paul Graham&#x27;s essays.
评论 #39762999 未加载
评论 #39762346 未加载
评论 #39762626 未加载
gist大约 1 年前
Entirely and obviously self serving in that not only is this probably the only &#x27;business&#x27; world that Paul has been exposed to (he started a tech company) but Paul also benefits (as do VC&#x27;s and angel investors) from the entire eco system of young people taking chances with a small chance of success. The investor (and YC) wins with lots of people trying regardless of how many fail.<p>And note that the chances of founders and companies that have passed and been anointed with money is below (how much? I don&#x27;t know) companies that haven&#x27;t even made it to that round (to be potentially winnowed out). And have spent time and perhaps family money.<p>Will point out that I benefit from all of this (let&#x27;s call it &#x27;pick axe&#x27; for short) but I would or could never with a straight face and conscience write or give the same advice to kids in high school. Shoot for the moon? Risky. Sure if you have family money to fall back on possibly take the chance.<p>Especially and in particular &#x27;how to start google&#x27; (meaning something with huge potential).<p>Oh yeah back in olden times I started a company right out of college and did pretty well and sold it (with ZERO investor money).<p>Lastly the joke that existed back and forever was someone saying &#x27;find a good lawyer&#x27; as if doing so is a matter of knowing you had to do it not the specifics of how to do it.
suyash大约 1 年前
Ok, so I am having a hard time buying the idea that just make a fun project if you want to create a something like &#x27;Google&#x27;. Startup 101 teaches us that you need to solve a painful problem that lot of people have, that is the best way to create &#x27;Google&#x27;, so isn&#x27;t the advise contradictory?
评论 #39760662 未加载
评论 #39757211 未加载
评论 #39761749 未加载
评论 #39759361 未加载
评论 #39760979 未加载
评论 #39781269 未加载
评论 #39776166 未加载
red_admiral大约 1 年前
Paul Graham is second to no-one in understanding the startup ecosystem, but there&#x27;s some points here that only tell one side of the story.<p>Before I get to the complaints though - am I the only one with the feeling there would be a huge market niche for a search engine that gave as useful results as Google did in its earlier days? It sometimes feels like half the results for non-tech-related searches these days lead to low-quality AI-generated SEO-optimised fake content.<p>&gt; If you&#x27;re not sure what technology to get good at, get good at programming.<p>We tried this with unemployed former coal miners in Appalachia. It turns out, the real secret sauce here is &quot;be the kind of person who can get good at programming&quot;. I&#x27;m with Freddie deBoer here, as he says in his book The Cult of Smart: we need to accept that not everyone has the same intellectual abilities. Once we do that, we can start thinking about how we make a world that works for the half of the population below the median on this dimension.<p>&gt; ... facebook ...<p>The other story I heard about Zuckerberg is that he got his first 1000 users by scraping everyone&#x27;s profile picture off the university &quot;facebooks&quot;, then making a page where you could rate the women as &quot;hot&quot; or &quot;not&quot;. I feel like missing this part out gives a rather one-sided picture of the story - especially if there were any young women in the class that PG originally gave this talk to. That&#x27;s a shame because PG makes a very different point in &quot;Why it&#x27;s safe for founders to be nice&quot; [1].<p>&gt; (US uni admissions are done badly)<p>I agree with footnote 3 that determination and resourcefulness are important, but you also need to be able to program and reason mathematically if you want to start the next google. There are a lot of incredibly determined and resourceful students on liberal-arts or law degrees who might go far in the world, but they&#x27;re not the person you want as a _technical_ co-founder.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulgraham.com&#x2F;safe.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulgraham.com&#x2F;safe.html</a>
alismayilov大约 1 年前
I&#x27;m wondering if there is a research about which percentile of these two groups became rich: People who started a company vs People who worked for Tech companies.
评论 #39757493 未加载
评论 #39758839 未加载
评论 #39757997 未加载
评论 #39758176 未加载
AIorNot大约 1 年前
This advice is horrible for 14 year olds - it’s the equivalent of saying hey kids go become a movie star, rock star, sports champion or rapper
评论 #39763268 未加载
评论 #39762928 未加载
评论 #39763454 未加载
swang720大约 1 年前
I was really excited to open this thinking it would be a thought experiment on how to restart all of Google&#x27;s services if they ever went down all at the same time. Was mildly disappointed to find that this was about starting the next Google.
评论 #39763096 未加载
BMSR大约 1 年前
What I want to know is how to become an individual that is able to obtain the kind of things that provide leverage. I already have the machines, I just don&#x27;t have the platform to move around exciting events and I simply stay in my room. I don&#x27;t even have a bank account afaik. My paypal account insists on using chinese language (it&#x27;s cursed). I&#x27;m waiting for github to implement a currency I can use. Then again, maybe there&#x27;s nothing I would do differently.
评论 #39764960 未加载
dpflan大约 1 年前
I am curious how this ethos of the 3 things you need and playfulness&#x2F;not-intended-to-be-a-startup startups project is in enacted per batch. Like YC&#x27;s now numerous sales operations&#x2F;software companies in the past batches: 19-22 years are making email-based-crms for their friends? (I guess a batch and other batches are &quot;friends&quot; so goalposts shift and magically appear). The growth in sales saas companies out of YC seems less of fun project and more of this is a business opportunity for the enterprise. Probably for other spaces as well. Is there dissonance between the tenets of this essay and actually YC companies of late? Does someone have better analysis, would be much appreciated?<p>&quot;&quot;&quot; What you need in a startup idea, and all you need, is something your friends actually want. &quot;&quot;&quot;
评论 #39758759 未加载
评论 #39761063 未加载
advael大约 1 年前
I know people mention that this advice smacks of survivorship bias, and I think that&#x27;s pretty obviously going to be a part of any advice given about economic outcomes whose odds of working out are perhaps a whole order of magnitude better than lottery tickets<p>I think it&#x27;s more important to note how talks like this use &quot;children&quot; as an excuse to present a very sanitized version of the history being discussed. I think a massively underappreciated mechanism by which American culture distorts history is by its very lax and sometimes supportive norms about fudging the truth and sometimes even outright lying to children
评论 #39757888 未加载
评论 #39758507 未加载
评论 #39761102 未加载
bearjaws大约 1 年前
Paul Graham sounds like a boomer telling their kids to go apply in person or go door to door for jobs. Especially talking about Software startups, which will increasingly have a lower and lower barrier to entry (aka lower profitability)<p>Theres simply no way to get away with what Google, Facebook or Uber did today. You will not sneak your software into enterprise customers, you will not be able to skirt regulations.<p>Hell the big money pot of getting acquired may be dead too, e.g. Figma.<p>For most startups, you will fail. For the top 1% of companies you can hope to at best make a comfortable living at a multi-million dollar valuation. Only the .0001% will become a Google.
评论 #39763031 未加载
dekhn大约 1 年前
Paul is fundamentally wrong with one thiing here: Larry knew google was going to be huge from the beginning. His brother Carl was already a multimillionare in tech and taught him everything required to set up a future successful company. Larry made it clear to me that he always planned Google to be a large cash-generating cow to invest in long-term AGI and there were only a few times at the beginning when he truly feared that wouldn&#x27;t happen.
评论 #39757770 未加载
评论 #39757640 未加载
评论 #39760729 未加载
w10-1大约 1 年前
This is entirely fair in its goal and perspective.<p>It&#x27;s not about starting Koch Industries or Disney.<p>It&#x27;s not about some ideal world where connections and funding don&#x27;t matter.<p>It&#x27;s about a kind of productive problem solving that creates value for other people by solving problems they just accept as friction in their lives.<p>It&#x27;s insightful in focusing on how projects you love can end up helping others.<p>But it&#x27;s a little misleading in that people are listening not because they are doing what they love, but because they want to be successful - ideally to take what they love and turn it into success - according to this plan.<p>Let&#x27;s say each year 10,000 people would love to become professional football players, 500 make it to the NFL, and 5 become household names - success stories.<p>There&#x27;s no real accounting for the time wasted by the 9,500 doing the extra required not out of enjoyment of the game but to become successful (leaving aside any actual costs like TBI). It&#x27;s at least an exported cost. But it might have other downstream effects, making someone less confident in their judgement, less likely to engage in making a better world of whatever sort.<p>One of the Buddhist precepts is not to sell the wine of delusion (in some translations). But it&#x27;s also soul-killing to tell someone how likely they are to fail; who says that at a wedding? What benefit is that?<p>Paul Graham made a success of helping others be successful. That&#x27;s a really good model to consider: to do <i>and</i> teach <i>and</i> help. So I would take this as good teaching for teens.
评论 #39757765 未加载
ranman大约 1 年前
&gt; Don&#x27;t try to guess whether gene editing or LLMs or rockets will turn out to be the most valuable technology to know about. No one can predict that. Just work on whatever interests you the most.<p>This optimizes for Paul&#x27;s outcomes not for the individual outcomes.
评论 #39763620 未加载
评论 #39763511 未加载
评论 #39763199 未加载
评论 #39763158 未加载
评论 #39763683 未加载
评论 #39762954 未加载
评论 #39763884 未加载
评论 #39763129 未加载
Scubabear68大约 1 年前
This essay glosses over the fact that most startups die a horrible death and earn little to no money for the founders.<p>Somewhere in this essay it needs to say “99% of you who try this will fail”.
评论 #39757373 未加载
评论 #39758426 未加载
评论 #39757285 未加载
评论 #39757857 未加载
评论 #39757267 未加载
评论 #39757277 未加载
评论 #39757534 未加载
ak_111大约 1 年前
Am surprised PG gave this talk at a UK school without mentioning an important assumption that they will need to migrate to the US in his opening paragraph.<p>All the examples he mentioned Google, himself and the Irish Stripe founders had to do the same for their startups.<p>Sadly in the UK all the current unicorn &quot;startups&quot; are a bit iffy: XTX (high frequency hedgefund), betfair (betting company), tripledot studios (Zynga like company).<p>Unfortunately mega success in startups doing soemthing innovative is non-existent in Europe and UK in particular. Mistral stands out to how exceptional it is to the rule, and the closest other one I can think of is BioNtech.<p>Sadly the highest expected route to fortune in the UK remains quant trading in finance. Including starting your own hedge fund.
评论 #39757840 未加载
评论 #39760793 未加载
评论 #39757675 未加载
评论 #39757724 未加载
kleiba大约 1 年前
<i>...including a boss telling you what to do.</i><p>You leave that to your customers and stock holders instead.
abhayhegde大约 1 年前
While I absolutely agree with PG here on identifying a missing link and solving it with technology as your own project is a good way to own a startup, I also feel most of his examples are reminiscent of survivorship bias.<p>For every one of these giant trillion dollar companies, there are also thousands of companies that couldn&#x27;t make it. Also, just by the distribution of it all, not every company <i>can</i> be a Google. Not trying to be pessimistic here; everyone should be able to try solving some problem as a project and have fun meanwhile. However, expecting a Google out of it could be a bit too demanding.
评论 #39761178 未加载
评论 #39761133 未加载
评论 #39760984 未加载
评论 #39762125 未加载
评论 #39762071 未加载
评论 #39761046 未加载
评论 #39761476 未加载
FrustratedMonky大约 1 年前
Survivor Bias anyone?<p>Bill Gates, Zuck, Jobs, etc....<p>Students should quit school. -&gt; (?) -&gt; profit
评论 #39757382 未加载
radicalriddler大约 1 年前
Wanting to read PG articles while working was one of the reasons I started up a project called WebToSpeech[0]. It&#x27;s not a startup, it&#x27;s more just a project I created so I could listen to articles while working. I thought about making it a startup, hence the dicky landing page, but didn&#x27;t have time.<p>It&#x27;s not open to sign ups or anything (blocked in Supabase), so this isn&#x27;t really trying to be a marketing exercise, the idea about joy projects just resonated with me.<p>If you want to listen to the generated audio (really it just custom parses a web page and sends it off to azure), I&#x27;ve uploaded it to a public Cloudflare R2 bucket[1]. It&#x27;s not perfect, I haven&#x27;t fully configured the SSML to treat quotes correct, and I&#x27;m adding weird breaks in between normal text and anchors, but... it&#x27;s a project :).<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.webtospeech.app&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.webtospeech.app&#x2F;</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;publicmedia.webtospeech.app&#x2F;b3dc8034-c2f4-4835-afe8-2d8bdab489d7.mp3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;publicmedia.webtospeech.app&#x2F;b3dc8034-c2f4-4835-afe8-...</a>
评论 #39762750 未加载
photochemsyn大约 1 年前
This article only mentions Stanford once, so here&#x27;s some additional information:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;new.nsf.gov&#x2F;news&#x2F;origins-google" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;new.nsf.gov&#x2F;news&#x2F;origins-google</a><p>&gt; &quot;The National Science Foundation led the multi-agency Digital Library Initiative (DLI) that, in 1994, made its first six awards. One of those awards supported a Stanford University project led by professors Hector Garcia-Molina and Terry Winograd... Around the same time, one of the graduate students funded under the NSF-supported DLI project at Stanford took an interest in the Web as a &quot;collection.&quot; The student was Larry Page.... Page was soon joined by Sergey Brin, another Stanford graduate student working on the DLI project. (Brin was supported by an NSF Graduate Student Fellowship.)&quot;<p>Under a rational and fair approach to patents, anything created with taxpayer funds would be available to all American businesses under a non-exclusive licensing program. However, in the 1980s, Bayh-Dole was pushed through which allowed exclusive licensing of those inventions to private parties. This is nothing but theft from the taxpayer, the entity who funds the NSF, which funded this research effort, which generated PageRank.<p>As a result, Google didn&#x27;t face market competition for some time, and was able to create a monopolistic situation, and as with all monopolies, this resulted in the degradation of their product, which is why, as everyone seems to agree, Google search results are much worse today than they used to be.<p>[edit: contemplate the outcome if Brin &amp; Page had instead invented PageRank as Apple or Microsoft employees - would they have been able to run off with the IP and found a company?]
评论 #39757352 未加载
erickhill大约 1 年前
This has probably been mentioned before on previous posts to Mr. Graham&#x27;s site, but I find the 1998-ness of the underlying HMTL and simple (if fuzzy) front end (with image map!) that even my PowerBook Pismo can render and appreciate a total blast of fresh air. A mild shame it is running HTTPS so more vintage hardware can&#x27;t access it, but I understand why.<p>Anyhoo, props to 1998 era web design. Sincerely.
jameshart大约 1 年前
The blindness to privilege that’s tied up in the part about why you ‘need’ to go to a good (by which he means highly selective) school…<p>&gt; if you want to start a startup you should try to get into the best university you can, because that&#x27;s where the best cofounders are...<p>&gt; The empirical evidence is clear on this. If you look at where the largest numbers of successful startups come from, it&#x27;s pretty much the same as the list of the most selective universities.<p>Is it at all possible that the people who are able to take a gamble on founding a startup rather than getting a job are also disproportionately drawn from the wealthy class that is also able to afford the privileges necessary to get their kids over the admissions humps needed to get into highly selective schools?<p>Because in spite of the suggestion that getting into these schools is a matter of ‘doing well in your classes’, Graham knows and acknowledges in his footnote that he knows full well that’s actually not what these schools are selecting for anyway:<p>&gt; US admissions departments make applicants jump through a lot of arbitrary hoops that have little to do with their intellectual ability. But the more arbitrary a test, the more it becomes a test of mere determination and resourcefulness.<p>‘Mere determination and resourcefulness’? Or the background, finances and support and time necessary to make the grade in terms of non academic achievements, volunteer work, experience, extracurriculars, etc?<p>But even if you get in through academics plus determination and resourcefulness… will you also have the resources to take a risk on turning a project into a startup?<p>This is cargo cultism. Yes, successful founders are disproportionately drawn from high end selective schools, because they are disproportionately drawn from the community of people who come from a background of privilege, and are academically bright. Such people naturally tend to end up at Stanford or MIT or wherever.<p>But <i>getting in to Stanford or MIT</i> doesn’t magically make you into a member of that privileged class.
评论 #39758345 未加载
评论 #39758875 未加载
评论 #39758746 未加载
评论 #39758315 未加载
评论 #39758323 未加载
评论 #39759739 未加载
评论 #39758866 未加载
评论 #39758797 未加载
评论 #39758340 未加载
评论 #39758215 未加载
confoundcofound大约 1 年前
It’s so deflating to see both YC &amp; PG focus their content almost solely on the younger generations. As someone who came to tech later in their mid-30s, it’s not hard to feel like expired goods when the “thought leaders” of tech are unabashedly gunning for younger minds with little to no acknowledgement of those who may want to start ventures during later stages of life.<p>The more I try to plug myself in, the more it seems like starting a company at this age is borderline schizophrenic delusion.
评论 #39757467 未加载
评论 #39757709 未加载
评论 #39757529 未加载
sarimkx大约 1 年前
&gt; If you&#x27;re not sure what technology to get good at, get good at programming. That has been the source of the median startup for the last 30 years, and this is probably not going to change in the next 10.<p>Did not expect this tbh. So many people here worried about the future of programming but PG believes we&#x27;re safe! Alas, something positive!
mike_hearn大约 1 年前
There&#x27;s a lot to like about this speech, but if a 15 year old heard it and then asked me for more detail I&#x27;d have to point out a few things that were glossed over:<p>1. 15-25 year olds who do programming passion projects are often attracted to video games. Video game companies are not &quot;startups&quot; in the sense pg means here. You will not get rich by indulging a passion for the entertainment industry.<p>2. You do in fact need capital to do a startup, and there is a lot more to getting that than just having cofounders and something you&#x27;re interested in.<p>3. &quot;What you need in a startup idea, and all you need, is something your friends actually want.&quot; This isn&#x27;t really true, is it. I thought there is another pg&#x2F;ycombinator essay somewhere that warns people away from specific types of startup pitches, and one of them is something like &quot;an app that tells you about events in your local community&quot;. Supposedly this is one of those things that everyone wants to use and everyone wants to work on, but which never turns into a successful startup.<p>There are actually a lot of things that your friends might want which are not startup material anywhere except Sand Hill Road, mostly because there are lots of things people want but won&#x27;t pay for. A sad example of this is developer tools. If you take pg&#x27;s advice literally and learn programming, hang out with other people who do that and then do projects with them, soon you will see lots of sticky doors that look like missing bits of infrastructure. Unfortunately startups that do dev tooling aren&#x27;t a good way to get rich. Developers generally don&#x27;t or can&#x27;t buy things, so you have to sell to their CTOs and thus all the money accumulates in companies like Amazon or Microsoft. Example of what happens if you try, even with great PMF: Docker.<p>Most kids with ideas in the world don&#x27;t have the contacts or work visas to raise money from US VC firms. They need a project that people will pay money for immediately. Unfortunately, one of the side effects of the size of the US VC ecosystem is that if someone comes up with a good idea that takes off and they try to grow like a normal company, and they <i>aren&#x27;t</i> taking VC money, then they will be immediately outcompeted by someone who does, simply because whoever does have that access will engage in market dumping until there&#x27;s nobody else left except other VC funded startups. One of the US funded companies will end up taking the entire market even if they are burning money with no hope of ever balancing the books, but that&#x27;s OK because one of the VC&#x27;s other investments can always be persuaded to give a clean exit.<p>Example: DailyMotion (European) vs YouTube (US). At the time YouTube was bought they didn&#x27;t have a hope in hell of ever being a standalone business and didn&#x27;t even care to try, but they were down the road from Google and were scaring Larry&#x2F;Sergey&#x2F;Eric with their success. Buying a company if you can just jump in your car to go visit them is easy, if you need to constantly do trans-Atlantic flights, not so easy. It doesn&#x27;t make sense to bet on the &quot;grow like crazy and wait for an exit&quot; strategy elsewhere. WhatsApp is another example of an MTV based company that had no strategy beyond grow-and-exit. I actually made a WhatsApp-like app a few years before the smartphone revolution hit, and my friends thought it was awesome, but I had no illusions that it could ever be a business. And indeed none of these messenger apps ever have been. In the world of &quot;startups&quot; (vs small businesses), you don&#x27;t necessarily need to care.
评论 #39758457 未加载
gen220大约 1 年前
I wonder if there are some other companies that would be better to hold up as paragons to high schoolers.<p>Apple, Patagonia (and its predecessors), WhatsApp (pre-FB), Trader Joe’s (pre acquisition), Yahoo! (pre-‘99) are some that come to mind for me. Any others?
ttul大约 1 年前
Most startups end up failing. The ones that don’t fail succeed only a little and end up as lifestyle businesses. Nothing wrong with that, but it should be acknowledged.<p>If you want to play the “next Google” game, get ready to be disappointed by Lady Luck.
KETpXDDzR大约 1 年前
PG forgot two very helpful requirements:<p>* Have a rich family to get you into an elite university and to give you the financial independence to start a startup<p>* Be lucky. Only ~1% of all startups succeed.
jankovicsandras大约 1 年前
Another point of view:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;insurge-intelligence&#x2F;how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;insurge-intelligence&#x2F;how-the-cia-made-goo...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;insurge-intelligence&#x2F;why-google-made-the-nsa-2a80584c9c1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;insurge-intelligence&#x2F;why-google-made-the-...</a><p>(I don&#x27;t know how truthful these articles are, but found them interesting to read.)
BogdanPetre大约 1 年前
Start a company to work on exciting projects and potentially get rich, by mastering technology, creating based on interests, and finding like-minded cofounders
babl-yc大约 1 年前
I couldnt finish reading the essay because I was distracted by the generally smug tone of it.<p>99.99% of people who read this article are not going to start the next Google. Being a successful entrepreneur requires an incredible amount of luck, timing, skill, and risk taking.<p>If you choose that path, great, but that in no way devalues the skill building, network building, and predictable income of working for someone else.
评论 #39760017 未加载
评论 #39760657 未加载
评论 #39759923 未加载
benzible大约 1 年前
&gt; So Mark Zuckerberg shows up at Harvard in 2003, and the university still hasn&#x27;t gotten the facebook online. [...] But Mark is a programmer. He looks at this situation and thinks &quot;Well, this is stupid. I could write a program to fix this in one night. Just let people upload their own photos and then combine the data into a new site for the whole university.&quot; So he does. And almost literally overnight he has thousands of users.<p>Kinda, but this skips over the whole Facemash thing <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thecrimson.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;2003&#x2F;11&#x2F;19&#x2F;facemash-creator-survives-ad-board-the&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thecrimson.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;2003&#x2F;11&#x2F;19&#x2F;facemash-creat...</a>
评论 #39761044 未加载
dirkc大约 1 年前
This seems to be the main message. And it&#x27;s followed with such a sweet lacing of irony in the associated footnote<p>&gt; The empirical evidence is clear on this. If you look at where the largest numbers of successful startups come from, it&#x27;s pretty much the same as the list of the most selective universities.
hn_throwaway_99大约 1 年前
While I agree with a lot of the criticisms that have been posted here (first and foremost that it is <i>exceedingly bad advice</i> to <i>take</i> advice on being successful from someone who is like six sigmas to the right of the curve on how their efforts were rewarded - it&#x27;s like reading from Taylor Swift or Simone Biles or Usain Bolt about &quot;to succeed you just need hard work and to believe!&quot;. As it&#x27;s taken many, many years of therapy for me to internalize, if you get the majority of your self-worth through what you <i>do</i>, you&#x27;re gonna have a bad time...) I think it&#x27;s also a good idea to keep in mind the general HN guideline of &quot;Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says.&quot;<p>In that sense, I <i>do</i> strongly agree with the overall conclusion, &quot;That&#x27;s it, just two things, build stuff and do well in school.&quot; Building stuff for your own edification, and soaking up as much knowledge and relationships while you&#x27;re in school, is really sound advice that works regardless of your end goal.
评论 #39757224 未加载
评论 #39757310 未加载
评论 #39757273 未加载
xanderlewis大约 1 年前
&gt; …get good at programming. That has been the source of the median startup for the last 30 years, and this is probably not going to change in the next 10.<p>Interesting comment; seems at odds with what a lot of others seem to think at the moment. But time will tell. I suspect he’s right.
taneq大约 1 年前
I love the opening because the mission statement of my company has always been &quot;make sure taneq doesn&#x27;t ever have to go back to a real job&quot;. Don&#x27;t get me wrong, at most points a &#x27;real job&#x27; would have been easier but easier wasn&#x27;t the mission.
elwell大约 1 年前
&gt; But the more arbitrary a test, the more it becomes a test of mere determination and resourcefulness.<p>So Leetcode is actually a good way to hire?
评论 #39757305 未加载
评论 #39758952 未加载
评论 #39757219 未加载
评论 #39757234 未加载
antisthenes大约 1 年前
This reads like it was written by an LLM trained on self-help books.<p>Is this the guy that a lot of HNers look up to?
评论 #39758591 未加载
1vuio0pswjnm7大约 1 年前
&quot;It really matters to do well in your classes, even the ones that are just memorization or blathering about literature, because you need to do well in your classes to get into a good university. And if you want to start a startup you should try to get into the best university you can, because that&#x27;s where the best cofounders are. It&#x27;s also where the best employees are. When Larry and Sergey started Google, they began by just hiring all the smartest people they knew out of Stanford, and this was a real advantage for them.&quot;<p>Opinions may differ but to me this sounds really pathetic. &quot;[B]lathering about literature.&quot; Maybe he is addressing a room full of social outcasts.<p>Yes, there is so much money that has flowed through Google, it&#x27;s truly astounding, but nevertheless, beyond fortuitous circumstances, this has only persisted because of dissemination of online ads and anti-competitive conduct. Is there is any kid who is thinking, &quot;My dream is to put ads on every screen and collect more data about peoples&#x27; lives that has ever before been collected. Settle all the lawsuits against us for violating peoples&#x27; privacy, pay off all the regulators, fire people by the thousands, let harassment run rampant amongst our managers, and destroy eveidence so the government cannot catch us breaking the law.&quot; All they see is the money and hype and, during ZIRP, lack of comparable alternatives in terms of opportunity and compensation.<p>Silicon Valley VC telling kids that learning how to program is more important than getting an education, advising them to go to university not for the education but to find &quot;cofounders&quot; and employees. Hard to rationalise how this would be healthy advice for anyone.
jp57大约 1 年前
<i>The trick is to start your own company. So it&#x27;s not a trick for avoiding work, because if you start your own company you&#x27;ll work harder than you would if you had an ordinary job. But you will avoid many of the annoying things that come with a job, including a boss telling you what to do.</i><p>This is literally true, but it&#x27;s disingenuous. Not every job has a boss <i>telling you what to do</i>. Many jobs hire people for their expertise and pay them to solve problems for them, and in these kinds of jobs the employee collaborates with her boss on deciding what kinds of problems you will work on. Of course, it will only be enjoyable if the company&#x27;s problems are aligned with the employee&#x27;s interests.<p>If you are a technical expert with the kind of ability and acumen needed to run a successful start up, I would argue that it is at least as easy to find a company whose problems are aligned with your interests as to find investors who will truly let you pursue your own interests with their money.<p>&quot;Making it&quot; as a startup founder should be seen in the same class of success as making it as a rock star or an actor. There are lots of aspirants and hardly any of them succeed. Even though some manage to become wildly wealthy, the prior expected payoff is negative.
评论 #39760796 未加载
nostrademons大约 1 年前
&gt; If you&#x27;re not sure what technology to get good at, get good at programming. That has been the source of the median startup for the last 30 years, and this is probably not going to change in the next 10.<p>The challenge with programming as a career now is that most of the solely technical problems have been solved. If you&#x27;re looking for the YC playbook, start a SaaS that solves a specific problem that people will pay you for, those niches have been very carefully picked over for the last 15 years, and there are few that are very profitable remaining.<p>Most of the big remaining problems are ones of <i>incentives</i> - they are cases where a whole system is fractally fucked up, with lots of human actors all doing what is individually best for themselves but with a sum result that is a net negative for humanity. If you study the housing crisis, for example, you end up with municipalities that need ever-rising housing prices and ever-restricting supply to balance their budgets; residents who depend on their rising home prices to fund their retirement; developers who need to work within the local regulations that are explicitly designed to make their lives difficult; and young people who can&#x27;t move out because a second mortgage that requires their parents&#x27; ever-increasing home equity was used to fund their college education. Finding a better way to build houses doesn&#x27;t help here; you need to work around all the people who actively don&#x27;t <i>want</i> you to find a better way to build houses.<p>There is room for software here, but often in subtle and what seems &quot;evil&quot; ways. Your problem is other people; software is useful to the extent that it lets you work around other people. Technical skills are table stakes for this, but understanding people and their incentives is critical for this work.
humbleferret大约 1 年前
This essay isn&#x27;t a step-by-step guide to building &#x27;Google&#x27;, rather, a call for young people to consider entrepreneurship as a fulfilling alternative to traditional careers.<p>To maximise their chances of success, Paul suggests:<p>1. Become a builder: Gain expertise in technology or other fields you&#x27;re passionate about. (Does not have to just be coding, either!)<p>2. Start personal projects: Build things you and your friends find useful. Paul suggests this is the fastest way to learn and potentially discover startup ideas.<p>3. Collaborate: Work on projects with like-minded people. This fosters skill development and could lead to finding potential cofounders.<p>I liked how Paul also emphasises the importance of good grades in order to access top universities, where you&#x27;ll find other bright collaborators.<p>There are obviously many other paths, but if I wish I had this advice at 14 or 15.
评论 #39757583 未加载
评论 #39757456 未加载
ngd大约 1 年前
I&#x27;m generally interested if people here think that to a 14-15 year old, do those companies sound tremendously cool and does the premise of their value stir exciting thoughts and motivations? My slightly younger kids don&#x27;t really what Google, Apple or Facebook&#x2F;Meta means. If I explained this essay to them, I&#x27;d at least say &quot;the iPad&quot;, &quot;YouTube&quot;, &quot;the Oculus&quot; to make it more relatable.<p>To my mind, to immediately relate to kids in the UK, I would need to say TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Oculus, iPhone, iPad, and such, and not the company name.
gsky大约 1 年前
Even top ranked projects here won&#x27;t r receive more than a dozen users 2 days later. That&#x27;s the reality.
n0us大约 1 年前
In the YC Youtube videos it&#x27;s amusing that they (Jason and the other guy) almost always reference Google and Facebook despite the fact that neither of those companies were YC companies and none of the YC companies out of 4000+ funded (not even Stripe) come close to the scale or valuation of either Google or Facebook.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ycombinator.com&#x2F;topcompanies&#x2F;valuation">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ycombinator.com&#x2F;topcompanies&#x2F;valuation</a>
评论 #39759239 未加载
评论 #39760573 未加载
enlightenedfool大约 1 年前
Any chance for me at 45 and without stellar academic background? Or just hope for better chance next life?
评论 #39762101 未加载
评论 #39763290 未加载
fuzzfactor大约 1 年前
If you reduce it to a very certain first principle that can be applied similarly today, at Google they made electronics do what other people weren&#x27;t doing so well, ideally things that had never been done before.<p>Same thing as Packard &amp; Hewlett when they got the ball rolling . . .<p>Worked for Edison too, he really got in on the ground floor when it comes to electrons.
tcgv大约 1 年前
Finally his blog is using HTTPS :)
ArunRaja大约 1 年前
Summarised :<p>* as many(interested projects) -&gt; tech -&gt; product ideas<p>* Grades -&gt; top college -&gt; co-workers
keiferski大约 1 年前
“Learn to code and surround yourself with smart people” is good advice, but it’s kind of funny that Google was used as the example of peak success for a group of 15 year olds. I’m fairly willing to bet that most of them think of Google as boring and old, and not exciting or innovative. How to start TikTok or Minecraft would have probably been a more inspiring example.
评论 #39758799 未加载
评论 #39759006 未加载
htsb大约 1 年前
* [X] Viable ideas<p>* [X] Skills to build those ideas<p>* [ ] Runway to develop those ideas<p>* [ ] Someone to help find money to provide runway
sidcool大约 1 年前
I am glad he did not mention &quot;Ensure you are born in California&quot;.
gordon_freeman大约 1 年前
&gt; &quot;But you will avoid many of the annoying things that come with a job, including a boss telling you what to do.&quot;<p>Isn&#x27;t this a bit misleading and can only be true for companies that don&#x27;t take VC money or never go public (ex: Basecamp&#x2F;37 Signals)? For VC funded or public companies, ultimately you&#x27;d have to be responsible to answer to your shareholders.
评论 #39758609 未加载
评论 #39758772 未加载
评论 #39759462 未加载
评论 #39758684 未加载
评论 #39758570 未加载
hiddencost大约 1 年前
&quot;If you look at the lists of the richest people that occasionally get published in the press, nearly all of them did it by starting their own companies.&quot;<p>&quot;Of the 137 people in the global study who achieved billionaire status in the 12-month study period, 53 of them inherited $150.8 billion collectively, more than the $140.7 billion that was earned by the 84 new self-made billionaires in the same time period, the UBS study says.Nov 30, 2023&quot;
评论 #39757059 未加载
评论 #39757028 未加载
评论 #39757117 未加载
meigwilym大约 1 年前
I didn&#x27;t realise PG is a rugby fan.
a_n大约 1 年前
lol why do so many people here have such a loser&#x2F;average mindset, you can literally achieve anything, literally anything, just because you don’t want to work hard, you don’t gotta be so discouraging to other people, well I guess people who wanna achieve great things probably don’t care about the stupid lazy people, so it’s whatever But the fact is you can literally do anything, you just gotta give it your all…
评论 #39759550 未加载
评论 #39759583 未加载
评论 #39759974 未加载
评论 #39759785 未加载
评论 #39759880 未加载
wiradikusuma大约 1 年前
I want to offer a slightly contrarian view.<p>Unless you&#x27;re born with a silver spoon in your mouth, the best (safest, surest) way to start your entrepreneurial journey is to work for someone else. The goal is to learn everything about the rules of the trade and expand your network—these two things you don&#x27;t get from school—while being paid to do that.<p>On the side, do what PG says to keep your entrepreneurial spirit and avoid &quot;comfort zone&quot; i.e pursuing your career (which is actually fine, but we&#x27;re talking about starting a business right).<p>Probably you won&#x27;t end up building Google. But hey, maybe with this approach, you can give a silver spoon to your offspring.
ignoramous大约 1 年前
(tls) mirror: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;zCEbG" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;zCEbG</a>
bustling-noose大约 1 年前
I am sorry but this is a terrible write up. Because the gist of it all is &#x27;do what you are good at and help people&#x27; but giving examples of billion dollar companies in 90% of the write up shows - but also look at these billionaires its so cool.<p>You could start a sewing business with few clients at most. Thats still a start up and will make you just as successful and happy and content and will help your local community and if you are good at it become bigger over time. This is how humanity has evolved. These big tech startups are a thing since the last 20 years maybe. But businesses have existed for centuries and they all start with small projects.<p>But this writeup focusses on these billionaires and tech startup culture so much that it misses to focus on the part - &#x27;do your thing and it might not be programming&#x27;. Now being a founder of Y combinator might make you biased to look at only programming and tech companies but it&#x27;s a shame because tech companies only show up as giants in share value. The tangible world of businesses is vastly bigger and includes millions of startups serving billions that such people will miss completely maybe because they don&#x27;t have a website or a ticker in NASDAQ.<p>Such a sad hustle world we live in that we forget your local falafel vendor is also a startup who probably will expand to multiple falafel carts over time.
shafyy大约 1 年前
&gt; <i>It&#x27;s more exciting to work on your own project than someone else&#x27;s. And you can also get a lot richer. In fact, this is the standard way to get really rich. If you look at the lists of the richest people that occasionally get published in the press, nearly all of them did it by starting their own companies.</i><p>People like Paul Graham telling 14-year-olds that basically getting rich is the most important thing is one of the reasons we got into this late-stage capitalism nightmare in the first place. Fuck this.<p>Edit: Sorry, to update after my rant. So many things wrong with this advice. For most people, starting a company is not the best path to happiness. Sure, if you have a job, there&#x27;s a &quot;boss&quot; that tells you what to do as Graham notes, but if you think for a second you can do whatever the fuck you want when you start your own company, you&#x27;re dead wrong. Of course, Graham knows this.
评论 #39757125 未加载
评论 #39757064 未加载
评论 #39757060 未加载
评论 #39757192 未加载
评论 #39757406 未加载
评论 #39757085 未加载
评论 #39757191 未加载
评论 #39757058 未加载
评论 #39757098 未加载
评论 #39757132 未加载
memset大约 1 年前
I am baffled by the criticisms of this essay. I can&#x27;t identify any statements here which are false. We&#x27;re on hacker news, which is a site about programming and startups and capitalism. There theoretically couldn&#x27;t be a better audience.<p>I suppose the strongest criticism would be that pg&#x27;s advice outlines necessary conditions to start the next Google but are not sufficient. Yes, the stuff you &quot;make&quot; needs to feel like a fun project, but without the &quot;...something people want&quot; then your company will not make you rich. As with any advice, there there will always be exceptions (&quot;do you really need a cofounder?&quot;) but as far as &quot;here is some advice to achieve x&quot;, where x is &quot;create a billion-dollar company&quot; this isn&#x27;t a bad start.
评论 #39757499 未加载
walteweiss大约 1 年前
I’m following this advice for about two decades, and I’m not even close to being rich. I’m rather poor at the day.<p>One of the reasons is my background, besides ‘building my stuff’ I was very busy fighting the obstacles most of the people in a developed country would never meet. Or most of the people having parents would never meet.<p>Life got me in the middle of building a very nice thing, giving me obstacles I couldn’t manage. Then, when I was climbing out of it, there was the pandemic, which messed many things in my life.<p>I just migrated to Ukraine back then, and you all know what happened next, the Russian full-scale invasion. That’s only the public events, I’m ignoring all the personal stuff here.<p>Saying that, for me, it was about five years, at least, I paused with my projects. Some of them are slightly irrelevant, some are not. There are ones I still believe are very good, even now when I’m older and more experienced. I got a huge load of non-professional experience over these years, and it helps me to understand the world so much better now. Will I ever find my resources for building my ideas? Nobody knows. If I’ll survive the war, I think I will.<p>During this half a decade I juggled stupid jobs (won’t mention why to save time, personal life events) because for a regular job I’m either too qualified or have a very different experience, non-applicable to local market. And I’m way too expensive when I work as an employee. I’m more the founder &#x2F; employer type than the employee type, unemployable, as they used to brag in the Valley.<p>And my point is. I regret I never took my time to explore the professional life I despised all my life. This stupid CV&#x2F;resume and LinkedIn idiocracy. When I had no resources, I could easily manage any enterprise job. I’m very good at stupid politics if needed, but I don’t enjoy it. And I’m very good with the software tools, so I can do your average enterprise employee workday for a couple of hours time. That proved my previous years as a freelancer, building my company, and interacting with the people I know from the corporate world.<p>In time of my need, I was just contemplating others earning way too much for their skills. When I didn’t even have a stupid resume, but was usually overqualified for a senior position, not to say a junior one. And no resources to learn the things I missed from this corporate thing.<p>Now it’s getting better due to my personal life changes, but I just lost some years of professional development. Plus loads of money I could earn on a stupid job (I won’t burn out type, as I don’t give a flying duck type).<p>While I’m not arguing about the point, especially as a piece of advice for teenagers, I would recommend learning other options, and get as much different life experience as you can, while you’re very young. That experience is much more valuable than all the money you can get. I got loads of money and all of that money is burned by now. I could earn more (loss less) if I would be better prepared for personal stuff in my life. As it took way too much energy and affected my work way too much.<p>Also, I don’t believe you build Facebook or Google when you are super young. I would say that is more of a luck thing. I believe you build something valuable when you understand what is around you and how the World works. You can build your super project at 50, why not?<p>And as the P.S. the Zuck story is a pure manipulation. We all know that wasn’t even his idea.
paulmd大约 1 年前
you could never start google today. when you go to the VCs and make the pitch they say &quot;that business already exists, it&#x27;s called google&quot;.
benreesman大约 1 年前
I have mixed feelings about this, mostly because the stakes on giving people persuasive advice with an enviable track record in hand might be at its highest in a room full of 14&#x2F;15-year olds.<p>This is <i>exactly</i> the kind of thing that made me dramatically more ambitious and harder working when I started reading pg essays (pushing 20 years ago now), so I have a huge soft spot for the feeling&#x2F;nostalgia that I got when I just let it wash over me. And it’s ultimately why I think it nets out constructive in spite of some real problems: if I heard this at 15 I would have started working really hard at 15 and not 22 or 23, and I would have started cultivating relationships with people who were going to be powerful at 15, instead of arguably antagonizing powerful people until, well maybe still today [1].<p>It’s got some serious problems though: the way most people get rich is by having wealthy parents, though at the apex it’s having wealthy parents who raised you to work hard and manage relationships with powerful people well [2], so given that by 15 most of that already has or hasn’t happened, I think we can generally regard pg saying that as a “useful fiction”: outcomes will improve at the mean for 15-year olds who believe him about this, or such is my prediction.<p>The advice about university is extremely dangerous in 2024 for anyone without a privileged upbringing because university is a far inferior place to learn things than YouTube videos aggregating all the best university lectures in history with the even more effective education style pioneered by Grant with 3blue1brown. And while trying to achieve at a level where you go to Stanford without a mountain of uniquely nasty debt [3] is strictly a good thing in high school &#x2F; primary school, actually going to university via debt is an <i>extremely</i> dicey proposition if you miss and that distinction is tough to sell to that audience.<p>Better advice would be to start learning from the best educators in the world via a YouTube Premium subscription concurrent to high-school studies (and making them whiffle ball on a curve compared to peers that don’t), try to get a scholarship to an Ivy or Cal or something, but go to community college or directly into the workforce (Work for a Startup™) if you miss and don’t have graduate study on the agenda.<p>Mostly the feeling I get is that pg and his essays these days sit in the Venn between “well intentioned”, “aspirational&#x2F;idealistic” and “not true”. It’s a fine line sometimes between “aspirational” and “false”, it gets finer yet in light of Sinclair’s Maxim [4]: what might be dismissed in a low-effort way as “out of touch” or even “self-serving” is trivially unfair to pg. He has his own family he could be spending time with instead of speaking to young people, he doesn’t need or seem to want any more money. He’s just past the point where he can de-leverage his intellectual and emotional investment in a world that doesn’t exist anymore: he’s the LTCM of serious intellectuals in technology. The book about that is called “When Genius Failed”, and John Meriwether is a brilliant man who lived by an admirably robust ethical code in a very rough neighborhood.<p>[1] The most significant glitch in pg’s firmware is that he says “smart and hardworking” when he really means “good at becoming powerful”, a direct quote [5] about his protégée illustrates this very clearly.<p>[2] Pick a list of very rich people and click on all the links, a fine starting point is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_World%27s_Billionaires" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_World%27s_Billionaires</a>.<p>[3] Yes there have been some modest reforms, no it’s not fixed: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;business-67546893" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;business-67546893</a><p>[4] At the top, a man’s living can be about intellectual as well as financial capital: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;quotes&#x2F;21810-it-is-difficult-to-get-a-man-to-understand-something" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;quotes&#x2F;21810-it-is-difficult-to-ge...</a><p>[5] I’ve known too many YC alumni too well for too long to even engage with any hatchet job on a piece that if anything understates the reality: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;2016&#x2F;10&#x2F;10&#x2F;sam-altmans-manifest-destiny" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;2016&#x2F;10&#x2F;10&#x2F;sam-altmans-ma...</a>, please don’t prey on my worst instincts by tempting me to cite documented examples and credible primary sources.
评论 #39763282 未加载
评论 #39771581 未加载
xyst大约 1 年前
The cost of failure is way too high in this country for people to take a risk and venture out on their own. This is a privilege that has been reserved for the wealthy.<p>Larry. Sergey. Mark Z. Steve.<p>All of these people were born into families where both parents either had advanced degrees or were well off due to their success in the field. Failure for these people does not mean much. Maybe just a hit to their egos. But otherwise they keep living life, just not as the billionaires of today.
gumby大约 1 年前
&gt; If you look at the lists of the richest people that occasionally get published in the press, nearly all of them did it by starting their own companies.<p>Actaally if you look at those lists, the largest number made it by choosing their parents correctly.
评论 #39758926 未加载
评论 #39759298 未加载
评论 #39758895 未加载
评论 #39758790 未加载
评论 #39759212 未加载
评论 #39759711 未加载
评论 #39759808 未加载
评论 #39758905 未加载
PaulDavisThe1st大约 1 年前
Totally insane.<p>99% or more of the people who enable Google to do what Google does are employees of Google. Same with every other company. The odds of being the founder of a successful company are probably worse than being a professional sportsball player (if only because they turn over more frequently).<p>Does anything good come from encouraging kids to think that they will manage to sail through life as a successful business founder rather than an employee?<p>Does anything good come from encouraging people to ignore the actual situation that the overwhelming majority of the population finds itself in, and instead focusing on some essentially impossible pipe dream?<p>Obviously, every successful company <i>does</i> have founders. But so does every unsuccessful company. And what actually powers every successful company are its employees, not its founders.<p>The absolute worst of SV thinking, personified.
评论 #39759092 未加载
评论 #39759073 未加载
评论 #39759443 未加载
评论 #39759617 未加载
评论 #39759357 未加载
评论 #39759189 未加载
评论 #39759458 未加载
评论 #39759592 未加载
评论 #39759279 未加载
评论 #39759761 未加载
评论 #39759163 未加载
评论 #39759255 未加载
评论 #39759635 未加载
评论 #39759776 未加载
评论 #39759408 未加载
评论 #39759328 未加载
评论 #39759364 未加载
评论 #39759284 未加载
评论 #39759807 未加载
评论 #39759802 未加载
mattlondon大约 1 年前
I dislike this sort of advice for teenagers. You may as well tell them to be rock stars or professional sports people.<p>Tell the kids to study, don&#x27;t sell them an unobtainable dream
评论 #39760314 未加载
评论 #39758965 未加载
评论 #39759123 未加载
elektrontamer大约 1 年前
&gt; But you will avoid many of the annoying things that come with a job, including a boss telling you what to do.<p>I hear things like this a lot and I&#x27;m sick of it. There&#x27;s nothing wrong with working for someone, in fact it&#x27;s the best way to improve your skills as a beginner since you&#x27;re going to be mentored by people much more experienced than you. I still call my first boss to this day.
评论 #39760116 未加载
评论 #39760057 未加载
sgu999大约 1 年前
&gt; this is the standard way to get really rich<p>The standard way for a young 15yo to get rich, is to be passed on wealth by their parents. But starting a company can probably work, occasionally enough that we can use it as a smoke screen.
vouaobrasil大约 1 年前
&gt;It&#x27;s more exciting to work on your own project than someone else&#x27;s. And you can also get a lot richer. In fact, this is the standard way to get really rich.<p>&gt; You might have thought I was joking when I said I was going to tell you how to start Google. You might be thinking &quot;How could we start Google?&quot; But that&#x27;s effectively what the people who did start Google were thinking before they started it.<p>We shouldn&#x27;t be telling young people to start companies like Google or to aim for being really rich in the first place. We should be teaching children how to be more sustainable. Companies like Google are a net harm to society and the really rich like Sergey Brin and Larry Page are parasites, promoting the unsustainable ruthless capitalism that has caused the immense climactic problems of the world today.
评论 #39757206 未加载
d--b大约 1 年前
Inspirational talk for 14 year old to engage into extremely risky ventures for the sake of becoming the richest person in the world.<p>How irresponsible.
评论 #39758823 未加载
HMH大约 1 年前
&gt; You need three things. You need to be good at some kind of technology, you need an idea for what you&#x27;re going to build, and you need cofounders to start the company with.<p>So no word about funding from the CIA and NSA. If you want to build something that changes the world in such a profound way as Google did, you can not possibly expect the powerful not having a word with you. I am inclined to believe that these days you will need influential &quot;friends&quot; with aligned interests at some point.