TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Abraham Wald and the airplane diagram with red bullet holes

14 点作者 lwhsiao大约 1 年前

3 条评论

btilly大约 1 年前
I&#x27;m pretty sure that I encountered the survivorship bias story before that picture, but that picture is how everyone visualizes it.<p>But from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;steveblank.com&#x2F;secret-history&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;steveblank.com&#x2F;secret-history&#x2F;</a> I learned that what really helped the planes most was not better armor, it was radar countermeasures that kept the Luftwaffe from being able to target the bomber stream. If you have an hour, I highly recommend that talk. And the blog series that goes with it is brilliant.
评论 #39794226 未加载
评论 #39794781 未加载
mchobbes大约 1 年前
I want to be clear, up front, that I believe credit should go where credit is due but, ignoring the arrogance of the blog post in its entirety, there are two closely-related things that rub me the wrong way about this. First is the fact that the actual famous image (which is both the image the author uses at the top of their blog post as well as the one found on wikipedia — who, ironically, _do_ indeed give them credit) is not the image this person created. Second is the fact that the author did not even create the original image. As mentioned in the blog post, the original was created by Abraham Wald. So, this person is neither the creator of the original image, nor the creator of the famous image. They simply feel like they haven&#x27;t gotten enough credit for making it famous.
评论 #39794730 未加载
评论 #39794753 未加载
评论 #39795444 未加载
admp大约 1 年前
Please change the URL to <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;</a>, the cert has expired in 2021.