TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

OpenShift by Red Hat

329 点作者 kragniz大约 13 年前

27 条评论

0xbadcafebee大约 13 年前
If you don't like the idea of relying on RedHat to play with this tech, remember that it is Open Source. Download it, use it, heck make a business that builds on it.<p><pre><code> https://github.com/openshift/crankcase https://github.com/openshift/os-client-tools https://openshift.redhat.com/community/wiki/build-your-own </code></pre> (I will say though: they make it extremely easy to get started and I really like using OpenShift so far. I've never used Heroku, but if it's this user friendly i'd definitely have used it before... Why don't they have a free offering for people to test out the service?)
评论 #3976522 未加载
评论 #3976510 未加载
bobsy大约 13 年前
I don't like this "Free" business.<p>It doesn't make sense and the complete lack of pricing info really puts me off.<p>So I play around with this, like it and choose to stick with it. They then introduce uncompetitive pricing.. I just wasted my time. They do not need to give exact pricing - they might not know at the moment - but they should at least give an overview of what they plan to do.<p>&#62; We will keep this free plan for the foreseeable future. The free plan allows...<p>&#62; This free plan will exist while we develop and test the service. As the service becomes stable we will be introducing paid plans and you will be asked to upgrade.<p>These 2 statements make sense to me. The fact they mention nothing about pricing on their site confuses and annoys me.
评论 #3977229 未加载
评论 #3976702 未加载
评论 #3976973 未加载
评论 #3976568 未加载
评论 #3976429 未加载
T-A大约 13 年前
From the ToS ( <a href="https://openshift.redhat.com/app/legal/site_terms" rel="nofollow">https://openshift.redhat.com/app/legal/site_terms</a> ): "you give Red Hat a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through the web site"<p>That makes me a little nervous.
评论 #3976270 未加载
评论 #3976280 未加载
评论 #3976281 未加载
评论 #3976951 未加载
Kilimanjaro大约 13 年前
I tried the service a couple of months ago and it is really easy to use. Got a blog up and running in no time just to test the waters using bottle, jinja and mongo. No sweat.<p><a href="http://blog-georgenava.rhcloud.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog-georgenava.rhcloud.com</a>
nosh大约 13 年前
If you're interested in checking out how to get mongo running on openshift, here are some things to get started<p>- Good list of resources: <a href="https://openshift.redhat.com/community/developers/mongodb" rel="nofollow">https://openshift.redhat.com/community/developers/mongodb</a><p>- Lots of goodies in here: <a href="https://github.com/openshift" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/openshift</a><p>- Part 1 of a 4-part series on building mobile apps with titanium, mongodb and openshift: <a href="http://blog.10gen.com/post/23089705899/mobilize-your-mongodb-building-mongodb-mobile-apps" rel="nofollow">http://blog.10gen.com/post/23089705899/mobilize-your-mongodb...</a><p>- Upcoming webinar on node.js and mongodb with OpenShift: <a href="http://www.10gen.com/events/building-web-services" rel="nofollow">http://www.10gen.com/events/building-web-services</a><p>Disclaimer: I work at 10gen
ryancutter大约 13 年前
I wrote a Python web app on OpenShift (Tornado not Django) and really liked it. While I don't have experience with Heroku, I was really impressed with OpenShift.<p>However, be aware that not everything is enabled yet. I ran into problems when I discovered the multiprocessing package doesn't work (<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814991" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814991</a>).
jamesu大约 13 年前
I have yet to find a service as straightforward as Heroku. Cloudfront comes close... but i get the feeling especially when looking at the documentation that Heroku have really put in a lot of effort into making a simple to use application platform.
评论 #3976148 未加载
edtechdev大约 13 年前
Yeah I'm excited about it and it's getting me to finally take the step from traditional web app development (vps, php, etc.) to more easily scalable app development - and it's all open source, no vendor lock-in, and hopefully affordable pricing in the future.<p>Look forward to seeing more tutorials &#38; code samples online and on their site. For example has anyone tried out meteor (w/node.js &#38; mongodb) with it yet. Also, hopefully it will integrate with some of the browser-based IDEs out there like cloud9.
评论 #3980966 未加载
ique大约 13 年前
How can this be free? If I host a massive application here, will they shut it down or rate limit or how can this work?
评论 #3976118 未加载
评论 #3976117 未加载
评论 #3976598 未加载
japhyr大约 13 年前
Has anyone chosen openshift over heroku for django? I didn't see any pricing info; is openshift still in beta?
评论 #3976543 未加载
评论 #3976029 未加载
dabeeeenster大约 13 年前
No mention of pricing anywhere on their site. What?
评论 #3976125 未加载
评论 #3976719 未加载
bergie大约 13 年前
Very interesting, though documentation doesn't seem to be very comprehensive yet.<p>There is little information about process management, like <a href="https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/process-model" rel="nofollow">https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/process-model</a><p>Not to mention how to create custom Cartridges, like you can do with Heroku buildpacks: <a href="https://gist.github.com/fe7f04abbd9538b656c5" rel="nofollow">https://gist.github.com/fe7f04abbd9538b656c5</a>
评论 #3977693 未加载
will_work4tears大约 13 年前
Couldn't get their client software to work on Ubuntu. Even followed a few tutorials. I think I'm missing something, but haven't a bunch of time to invest.
评论 #3977252 未加载
amalag大约 13 年前
I tried openshift a few months ago for Rails. A real pain in the butt. They dont have simple deploy like Heroku. Even heroku can be time consuming in the beginning to get right, openshift was even more complicated. It may work better for Java I don't know, looks like they are right on the bleeding edge with support for Ruby 1.8.7.
评论 #3977704 未加载
评论 #3976305 未加载
评论 #3977706 未加载
gary4gar大约 13 年前
the rubyist in me is happy to report that openshift is written largely in ruby. so all ruby programmers should try running openshift in their own machinea
geuis大约 13 年前
The documentation is frankly awful. For example, when getting the status:<p>rhc domain status -l &#60;myemailhere&#62; I get an error about ~/.ssh/config not existing. I added my ssh key via the web interface and have no idea what's going on here.<p>In looking at the User Guide, I find it gets me no where. <a href="http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/OpenShift/2.0/html/User_Guide/chap-User_Guide-OpenShift_Web_Interface.html#sect-User_Guide-Configuring_Your_Local_Machine" rel="nofollow">http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/OpenShift/2.0/html/User_Gu...</a><p>The relevant message here is:<p>"If your system fails any of the tests, make a note of the error message and consult the relevant section of the OpenShift User Guide for further information."<p>Nothing like a circular reference that leads to nowhere.
评论 #3980771 未加载
diminish大约 13 年前
Do we have any major computing player remaining without an app cloud offering or plan?
评论 #3976253 未加载
nivertech大约 13 年前
Why all PaaS providers (Heroku, CF, OpenShift) building their CLI tools using Ruby? Are they copying Heroku? Maybe because Python used for OS itself? What dotCloud uses?
评论 #3979478 未加载
Ryan_Shmotkin大约 13 年前
Tsk tsk.. ruby 1.8.7 by default
评论 #3977393 未加载
评论 #3976385 未加载
ctrlaltesc大约 13 年前
Interesting that the install instructions for Red Hat Linux distributions is far more complicated than that of other Linux distributions.<p>But seriously, if they are offering a free platform to anyone with an email address then what sort of precautions are they taking to prevent abuse?
评论 #3976108 未加载
评论 #3977315 未加载
jefe78大约 13 年前
I wish they'd list pricing in the event you grow beyond the free plan. Reluctant to even bother trying without knowing that type of information.
twqqis大约 13 年前
just a quick compliment to RH; loving how the employees are giving constructive feedback on the comments here :)
robotomir大约 13 年前
How does it compare to CloudFoundry? Aside from having official PHP support, that is.
评论 #3979694 未加载
评论 #3977716 未加载
评论 #3977687 未加载
评论 #3979695 未加载
mythz大约 13 年前
I'm generally a fan of RedHat, but not having details on the most important point of OpenShift that will decide whether it will fail or succeed in the market (i.e. the price) is a scummy play - that I only expected from enterprises. I hope these "enterprise marketing" tactics aren't a trend for RedHat.
评论 #3977652 未加载
jballanc大约 13 年前
If you're not paying, you're the product.
评论 #3976229 未加载
评论 #3976164 未加载
评论 #3976723 未加载
thomasfl大约 13 年前
This is cool!
nathell大约 13 年前
I made a mental typo when reading the name and omitted the "f."
评论 #3977809 未加载