TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

They Praised AI at SXSW–and the Audience Started Booing

80 点作者 imartin2k大约 1 年前

19 条评论

keiferski大约 1 年前
I can&#x27;t pinpoint exactly when it happened, but in the last decade or so, the message coming from the tech industry has been less <i>&quot;technology will improve your life and help you be a better human being&quot;</i> and more <i>&quot;technology will replace you as a human being and make you obsolete.&quot;</i><p>I think this is a big, big mistake and a large reason why AI specifically and the tech industry in general is being perceived negatively. SV seems less interested in making &quot;cyborgs&quot; that enhance human abilities, and more interested in godlike AIs that aren&#x27;t human at all.
评论 #39764260 未加载
评论 #39764019 未加载
评论 #39764538 未加载
评论 #39764381 未加载
评论 #39764222 未加载
评论 #39764008 未加载
评论 #39764570 未加载
评论 #39764555 未加载
评论 #39764655 未加载
评论 #39764475 未加载
评论 #39768486 未加载
ordu大约 1 年前
<i>&gt; the audience booed louder when the word disrupted was used as a term of praise</i><p>Yeah, it is often goes like &quot;lets disrupt and see if we will be able to rip some benefits from the chaos after the disruption&quot;. And the fun thing that potential disrupters seem to believe that it is good for all, not only for them and only conditionally.
评论 #39764417 未加载
verve_rat大约 1 年前
Yup. Over the last 10-15 years the innovation in tech has gone from cool tech that serves users, that improves lives, to instead legal engineering, user hostile tech and behaviour that milks users for every last drop of revenue.<p>AI might be a cool tech that can serve to make the lives of actual humans better, but it might require breaking up big tech and fostering customer centric competition to realise any benefits to society at large.
mupuff1234大约 1 年前
&gt; &quot;I actually think that AI fundamentally makes us more human&quot;<p>Whether you are excited by AI or not that phase is just cringe BS and deserves all the booing, so maybe the crowd wasn&#x27;t &quot;booing ai&quot; but just booing the crappy presentation full of corp speak.
评论 #39764737 未加载
评论 #39764523 未加载
sgt101大约 1 年前
People are fed up with grift.<p>There are two types of grift - pure cynical (crypto, vr, ai influencing &amp; fake products)<p>- make me a medical system that I know can never get approved<p>- make me a business that will never ship a thing but get daddies tax bill halved<p>- make me code assistants that don&#x27;t actually help<p>and pure mean: products that are exploitative or knowingly unethical.<p>- make me a mental health chatbot without giving a shit that it tells people to kill themselves<p>- make me camera that records other people and tells me their weaknesses<p>- make me kill bots that will stop protestors from saying stuff my boss doesn&#x27;t want to hear<p>I think that people are really sick of grifters. I know I am.
评论 #39764357 未加载
评论 #39764549 未加载
vasco大约 1 年前
&gt; Not even Apple is like Apple anymore. A similar backlash happened a few weeks ago, when Apple launched its super-high-tech virtual reality headset. The early response on social media was mockery and ridicule—something Steve Jobs never experienced.<p>I definitely remember a huge viral wave of mockery about the iPad in 2010. It was everything from stretching things and calling it &quot;innovation&quot; (as in, just a big phone), comparisons to women&#x27;s sanitary pads, you name it. Mockery of Apple and Apple fanboys was one of the peak internet memes of the time. Mocking AI is tame in comparison.
评论 #39764518 未加载
teknopaul大约 1 年前
Much tech _is_ getting worse. Particularly AI, much is about cheaply making a bot that works x% of the time, it&#x27;s cheaper to piss off a few customers and pay no-one, than to do a good job.<p>No one likes that, it&#x27;s cheap and nasty hackery.<p>People like tech that works 100% of the time, and keeps doing it. Stuff that could not be done before that can now.<p>People don&#x27;t like churn. Constant upgrades. Built in obscelecense. AI that work 95% at best. Maps that make different decisions each time. UI fads. Framework wars. Google buying and killing services. Clis that are not automatable.<p>&quot;The only thing that is constant is the rate of chane&quot; is an observation that tech is not providing what was promised: automation.<p>Cheaper nastier flakey versions of what worked fine should get a boo.
boraoztunc大约 1 年前
Very good read. We definitely deserve healthy innovation that contributes to human flourishing.
advael大约 1 年前
I mean if the tech industry wanted people to like it, maybe it should treat them better?<p>We live in the smoking ruins of the world of our grandparents, and that is because, unambiguously, of industry and policy shaped by industry. Wages have stagnated. Cities have become places that are great if you have lots of money to spend and pretty hostile otherwise. Medicine has increasingly become a luxury, as has healthy food and a roof over your head. Meanwhile, in tech, the goodwill of the userbase has very rapidly and repeatedly been betrayed because capital wanted constant growth. News and media have been subsumed into a slog of ad-suffused &quot;content&quot; optimized to hook your attention. You are spied on in everything you do, supposedly to target more ads. Many new horrendous ways of abusing the labor force have been invented and then legalized by this industry<p>Now I hate telling people I study AI because SV people made a really interesting methodology into an apocalyptic cult whose adherents are often smugly dismissive of most recognizable human values in favor of a vague future that sounds like living in a video game made of vibes, and the main use case the optimization-obsessed finance-twiddlers that run the show can imagine is replacing workers in every domain, starting with artists. Why should they like this? Technology for technology&#x27;s sake is not what most people care about, and why should they when the last ten years of &quot;innovation&quot; has on balance mostly been against their interests?
评论 #39764225 未加载
评论 #39764503 未加载
Bengalilol大约 1 年前
To anyone interested, I deeply (no pun intended) recommend reading this essay which goes back in time in order to pinpoint the reasons we are all stranded.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arturoduran.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;07&#x2F;18&#x2F;the-era-of-the-tyrant-individual-the-end-of-our-common-world&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arturoduran.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;07&#x2F;18&#x2F;the-era-of-the-tyrant-ind...</a>
评论 #39803012 未加载
sarimkx大约 1 年前
I urge everyone to take some time out to read some of the comments on this post.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.honest-broker.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;they-praised-ai-at-sxswand-the-audience&#x2F;comments" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.honest-broker.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;they-praised-ai-at-sxswand-t...</a><p>Some really interesting perspectives in the comments.
padjo大约 1 年前
I remember Steve Jobs being heavily mocked at the time of the iPad release. So this maybe isn’t as new as the author claims.
PeterStuer大约 1 年前
One has to wonder wether those same people also boo when pundits praise advanced automation in factories. Feels like they suddenly discover luddism when the automation is coming into their own backyard.
评论 #39764450 未加载
locopati大约 1 年前
Go back and watch the old MCI amd AT&amp;T ads from the early 90s at the dawn of the web. They had an optimism that feels false coming from Apple &amp; Google &amp; all the others now. We know better now that they&#x27;re interested in money and market share more than benefits to people&#x27;s lives. The latter is an incidental reason to achieve the former. It was that way back then too, but it feels more blatant now.
yourapostasy大约 1 年前
Can someone please elaborate upon this:<p>&gt; If the current tech leaders can’t figure this out, they will be wiped away by history—that’s happened before, and will happen again.<p>When has this happened in history, to who, and what was the context? The examples I can think of were mostly related to technological advancements (mainframe to minicomputer, for example), and not related to general public anger.
评论 #39764630 未加载
Stranger43大约 1 年前
I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s that people fear that AI will make everyone live in luxury while the machines do all of the hard work, it&#x27;s that people realize that LLM&#x27;s and ML models have enough limitation and caveats to be of limited value outside of a few niche&#x27;s where they are treated as statistical models and not &quot;The AI Revolution&quot;.<p>The last 2 decades have seen a stagnation at the front end of technology and while this have led to a commodification it&#x27;s also demonstrated that web 2.0 and crypto was mostly grifts by companies and organizations that don&#x27;t really have an usefull vision. so as the web 2.0 revolution that originally inspired people at conferences like SXSW turned into an dystopia in the hands of companies like Twitter, Facebook and google, new grifts are going to get a whole lot more scrutiny going forwards.
dakial1大约 1 年前
I think the author might be mixing the tech with the capitalist model that governs tech nowadays. All new innovations eventually get corrupted by the need of making the shareholders happy and that’s the danger here with AI.<p>Not saying we should go full socialism here but there might be a smarter way of giving incentives (and punishments) to companies so that we can reach an equilibrium of all stakeholders interests (including the shareholders of course).<p>Otherwise there is no good intentioned (don’t be evil) tech&#x2F;AI that will resist the ruthless capital markets.
varelse大约 1 年前
Sure, people hate tech. And tech clearly hates its own customers. So why hasn&#x27;t something that doesn&#x27;t hate its own customers disrupted tech? If anything, the enshittification is just getting worse. Prime video&#x27;s random ads alone should have led to mass cancellations but it&#x27;s not happening, is it? So what exactly will lead to people walking away as opposed to grumbling as things keep getting worse and worse?<p>Reminds me a lot of politics in the United States at this point: stuck with two disappointing parties with almost no chance of a third party really shaking things up because the one thing they can agree on is that a third party should never arise.
评论 #39764519 未加载
renewiltord大约 1 年前
&gt; <i>These people literally come to the event to learn about new things, and even they are gagging on this stuff.</i><p>I remember the reactions on &#x2F;r&#x2F;technology when the iPhone or the iPad were announced. I remember the reactions when the M1 processor came out. Just like this audience, lots of people who subscribe to this stuff nominally care about new technology. But the truth is that where I religiously chant &quot;We&#x27;re ARSENAL, ARSENAL FC, we&#x27;re by far the greatest team the world has ever seen&quot; they chant something else.<p>These reactions are meaningless. &quot;The iPAD?! It&#x27;s four iPhones stuck together HAHAHAHA and named after a MENSTRUAL PAD HAHAHA this is going to flop&quot;.<p>The difference is that Arsenal will only fail to win the Champion&#x27;s League once every year. These guys die a thousand deaths every day they see new technology.
评论 #39763804 未加载