TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Grafana Labs Observability Survey 2024

20 点作者 shahargl大约 1 年前

4 条评论

jasonjmcghee大约 1 年前
Do you think 91% of people using grafana is an accurate figure? Seems very high.
评论 #39828044 未加载
评论 #39828074 未加载
评论 #39828077 未加载
评论 #39827978 未加载
评论 #39828244 未加载
评论 #39828607 未加载
nemo44x大约 1 年前
This is just a piece of marketing material - it's the survey of ~300 Grafana customers. Congrats to Grafana for getting their advertisement posted to this Website.
palijer大约 1 年前
&gt;About the respondents and methodology. This year, 306 people participated in the Grafana Labs Observability Survey. We did not contract an outside agency to solicit responses. Instead, we reached out to our community to participate, through our website, social media, and at various Grafana Labs and OSS events.<p>This should be right at the top as it indicates a substantial bias in the data.<p>Calling this survey &quot;Key findings and analysis on the state of observability&quot; is disingenuous at best with that methodology. If this team realistically thinks this small sample size and narrow grouping gives an accurate analysis of the big picture, I would be hesitant about any analysis their product can provide.
评论 #39828487 未加载
tmd83大约 1 年前
There seems to be newer players both open source and commercial now. But a lot of the focus seems in metric and specially distributed traces. Does anyone in the open source do code level profiling (cpu, allocation, locks etc.) preferably sampling profiler (including Java)?<p>I have only really found pyroscope.
评论 #39828883 未加载