TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Postgres Extensions should be packaged and distributed as OCI images

27 点作者 samaysharma大约 1 年前

4 条评论

lrvick大约 1 年前
Great timing. Just 2 weeks ago I produced what to my knowledge is the first full-source-bootstrapped, deterministic, and OCI-native PostgreSQL package.<p>Built and signed by multiple people and entirely distro agnostic. You can even build with your pick of several OCI engines on several operating systems so maximally portable too.<p>If extensions are packaged similarly it will sure make my life easier integrating them.<p>If you are going to package with only one standard, OCI is the most portable and flexible choice today IMO.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;codeberg.org&#x2F;stagex&#x2F;stagex&#x2F;src&#x2F;branch&#x2F;main&#x2F;packages&#x2F;postgresql&#x2F;Containerfile" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;codeberg.org&#x2F;stagex&#x2F;stagex&#x2F;src&#x2F;branch&#x2F;main&#x2F;packages&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #39949035 未加载
评论 #39949016 未加载
Vonng大约 1 年前
Why not continue to use rpm&#x2F;apt for building and packaging? You can reuse these packages in the Dockerfile and the image, but not the other way around.
评论 #39928483 未加载
ahachete大约 1 年前
Happy to see this in HN (thanks for submitting it!). OP here. AMA
zilti大约 1 年前
Repeat after me: Docker is not a package manager, and OCI not a package format.