TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A lazy and flippant classification of programming languages

83 点作者 lemper大约 1 年前

10 条评论

diamondap大约 1 年前
My all-time favorite flippant description of a programming language: someone once described Java as "a domain-specific language for converting XML files to stack traces."
bee_rider大约 1 年前
Surely we can be more flippant than that. There are three-ish types of languages:<p>C, Assembly: begrudging respect, they are ok for writing kernels (operating system and compute, respectively).<p>FORTRAN: the point of computers is to do math, why do you need any other language than the language for FORmula TRANslation?<p>Other languages: Bad.<p>Honorable mention: Matlab&#x2F;Octave or Numpy because I can’t be arsed to use a proper language while prototyping. But you can also use them in REPL mode so really they are halfway between a programming language and a UI.
评论 #39945819 未加载
vlovich123大约 1 年前
I love SQL on it&#x27;s own there. Where would Prolog, DataLog &amp; Lisp fall?
评论 #39945919 未加载
happypumpkin大约 1 年前
Sad not to see any lisps or APL but in his defense it does say lazy :)
sirwhinesalot大约 1 年前
Elixir and Erlang not being E-languages completely ruins this post.
CalChris大约 1 年前
Swift is an honorary C language. Fortran is an emeritus C language.
评论 #39945889 未加载
评论 #39945422 未加载
FrustratedMonky大约 1 年前
Think it is a miss to have F-Languages not mention F#
Darkskiez大约 1 年前
computers
评论 #39945380 未加载
评论 #39924013 未加载
supportengineer大约 1 年前
Curious how Smalltalk fits in.
AlbertoGP大约 1 年前
That’s a brief list. This video goes into more detail:<p>“Yet Another ULTIMATE Programming Languages Tier List (2024)” <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=AQccsZpEgYY&amp;t=91s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=AQccsZpEgYY&amp;t=91s</a>