"AI" is science fiction, it literally doesn't exist, and when I see this word in a headline without context I immediately flag it in my head as likely low quality and/or clickbait. Are the actors in this story even using machine learning to do this, or are they just using the well-worn playbook of pretending something is "algorithms" as a convenient cover up for human decision making? If the "gun detectors" in the New York subway are "AI", does that mean the TSA scanners at the airport are AI too?<p>The addition of "AGI" to clear up some confusion was welcome but I really think it's time to repo the word AI, because it's clearly being misused. Let's talk about machine learning if that's actually what they're doing here (I doubt it), otherwise we're just creating a framework where everything is fair game for HN because almost everything in the world today is "AI" and/or involves computers in some capacity.<p>I totally get that explaining "AI" vs "Machine Learning" to the rest of society is going to be like explaining the difference between free beer and free software and I've already given up, but I'd love for HN to be better than the Drudge Report and UK tabloids of the world on this one.