TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Can We Engineer Our Way Out of the Climate Crisis?

30 点作者 taylorbuley大约 1 年前

9 条评论

trane_project大约 1 年前
Yes, but not the kind of engineering mentioned in this article. Recently I went in a bit of a Youtube fueled permaculture&#x2F;afforestation binge.<p>Reforesting without planting trees by encouraging shrubs to grow by pruning them (which are really trees with too many branches to grow tall): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=RBP2uRQk5pQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=RBP2uRQk5pQ</a><p>Increasing water retention and underground storage by building simple rock dams: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=c2tYI7jUdU0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=c2tYI7jUdU0</a><p>Creating forests quickly with the Miyawaki method: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=y9c_Zlmqcgw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=y9c_Zlmqcgw</a><p>The solutions are there and rely on accelerating positive natural processes. But they don&#x27;t funnel public money into private pockets, so let&#x27;s fund harebrained schemes instead.
评论 #39926856 未加载
thefz大约 1 年前
What about we stop tiptoeing around the fact that we will have to hurt profit (especially for the gas&#x2F;plastic companies) to do so, and enact change instead of just trying to profit out of this situation as well?
评论 #39928885 未加载
sriram_malhar大约 1 年前
I feel the real issue is that we are all slaves to convenience and inertia.<p>Every single product we own, every single habit we have, pollutes the land, water and air, and hogs resources. Any engineering effort to address the resultant mess is unequal to the sheer scale of consumption, even if doesn&#x27;t have side effects of its own, like say permaculture. I think that the only solution is a shift to a simpler life style. But that&#x27;s not really going to happen, so nature will find a way that&#x27;s very inconvenient to us.
rayiner大约 1 年前
It will have to be either social engineering or real engineering, and I’d put my money on the latter.
bananapub大约 1 年前
we really are entering a dangerous phase of the climate crisis - people are pivoting from &quot;oh, it&#x27;s not real&quot; to &quot;oh, we should just do X&quot;, where X is any of:<p>- try to create a nuclear reactor industry in countries that don&#x27;t have one (spoiler: it takes decades, which is too long, people need to get to zero greenhouse gas emissions with existing quick-to-deploy technology like renewables)<p>- try to sell their magic beans, like &quot;SMR&quot;, which don&#x27;t exist<p>- try to sell their super magic beans, like fusion research, which even if someone made it work tomorrow, would take too long to deploy<p>- try to suggest that geo-engineering is a well-understood thing that we could&#x2F;should do and other things are less important<p>climate change can be stopped in the next few decades with basically just existing technology - choosing to not do it <i>is a choice</i>, which I would think most people would disagree with, but isn&#x27;t being offered as a choice, but as a fait accompli from the established interests who don&#x27;t want their industries to fall while others rise, even if that is what is good for society as a whole.
btotes大约 1 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;plxDy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;plxDy</a>
greenie_beans大约 1 年前
fwiw, direct carbon capture is what all of the fossil fuel CEOs think will save us.
meristohm大约 1 年前
Responding to just the headline, as I don&#x27;t have a NYT account and chose not to bother with paywall workarounds (and I&#x27;m not on wifi and chose to pay about $17&#x2F;mo for mobile service, including taxes and $5 for a gigabyte of data, which I&#x27;m both happy and careful with):<p>No.<p>No, not unless you include social and cultural engineering, towards a way of life that has worked for us for tens of thousands of years, a way of life with minimal to zero automation, with much of our time spent ensuring shelter, food, and companionship. This is not a bleak proposition to me, nor do I feel blinded by romanticism; such a life closer to the land and water is that much closer to death, but also, in the company of mutually-supportive family (to use the term broadly), entirely meaningful.
评论 #39926287 未加载
评论 #39926401 未加载
评论 #39926370 未加载
评论 #39926005 未加载
评论 #39926069 未加载
评论 #39927719 未加载
评论 #39926196 未加载
评论 #39926169 未加载
Timber-6539大约 1 年前
Sure. Only if you believe there was never a crisis in the first place as vividly described by the alarmists.