Unless it's extremely obvious (e.g. repeating the phrase "In conclusion, [...]"), I honestly just can't tell if something is "AI"-generated or not. Even reading an article pre "AI", it could look like it was produced by ChatGPT.<p>I've also hired people to write articles for my blog(s). Some of them are clearly AI-generated. Others are "maybe AI-Generated", or "probably AI-Generated with some editing". It is what it is, I guess. The web is changing.
Most A.I's that are used for that are just souped up versions of autocorrect, For example if you ask an A.I to count something, or answer a simple day-to-day question, for example "How many n's are in the word mayonnaise" (unless it looks it up in It's database) It won't answer It
I've only suspected it twice. I take this as a sign that I'm pretty good at curating my web feeds. I'm not sure that those two instances were really AI generated, or were just poor writing, but I removed those sites from my feed anyway.
Over the past year and a half or so, I've noticed a lot more web content that starts off seeming reasonably good, even if simplistic, but after the first paragraph or two becomes inordinately repetitive, and often drifts off into some vaguely related other subject that just on the whole doesn't make sense.<p>I suspect that this stuff is AI-written. It could also be just really mediocre human writing, but I've really not noticed this particular quality of repetitive, drifting-off-topic writing until fairly recently.