Interesting. I didn’t know this body of work. I haven’t read the documentation other than the abstract.<p>If the protocol is about knowing what information to inject at what node in the network to achieve consensus, the protocol can (and will) be used to inject whatever truths the parties with knowledge on the protocol believe in. If there are enough parties with opposing beliefs, then the network cannot be gamed beyond the status quo.<p>How does this protocol “choose” the truth to propagate in the face of opposing truths?<p>What power does the protocol give to parties who know how to work the system?<p>Or rather what resilience does the protocol have against “inside traders”?