TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The demise of email forwarding is getting closer

70 点作者 kruuuder大约 1 年前

10 条评论

NGRhodes大约 1 年前
From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.google.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;answer&#x2F;14229414#zippy=%2Cwhat-is-the-timeline-for-enforcement-of-sender-guidelines%2Cwhat-is-the-dmarc-alignment-requirement-for-bulk-senders" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.google.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;answer&#x2F;14229414#zippy=%2Cwhat-i...</a><p>----------------------<p>Starting February 1, 2024, all email senders who send email to Gmail accounts must meet the requirements in this section.<p>- Set up SPF or DKIM email authentication for your sending domains.<p>- Ensure that sending domains or IPs have valid forward and reverse DNS records, also referred to as PTR records.<p>- Use a TLS connection for transmitting email. For steps to set up TLS in Google Workspace, visit Require a secure connection for email.<p>- Keep spam rates reported in Postmaster Tools below 0.3%. Learn more about spam rates<p>- Format messages according to the Internet Message Format standard, RFC 5322.<p>- Don’t impersonate Gmail From: headers. Gmail will begin using a DMARC quarantine enforcement policy, and impersonating Gmail From: headers might impact your email delivery.<p>- If you manage a forwarding service, including mailing lists or inbound gateways, add ARC headers to outgoing email. ARC headers indicate the message was forwarded and identify you as the forwarder. Mailing list senders should also add a List-id: header, which specifies the mailing list, to outgoing messages.
throw0101c大约 1 年前
I was under the impression this is what Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) was created to solve:<p>&gt; <i>Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) is an email authentication system designed to allow an intermediate mail server like a mailing list or forwarding service to sign an email&#x27;s original authentication results. This allows a receiving service to validate an email when the email&#x27;s SPF and DKIM records are rendered invalid by an intermediate server&#x27;s processing.[1]</i><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Authenticated_Received_Chain" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Authenticated_Received_Chain</a><p>It&#x27;s how mailing lists are able to keep the original sender&#x27;s <i>From:</i> header in the messages delivered to members.
评论 #40052178 未加载
didntcheck大约 1 年前
So to clarify, &quot;forwarding&quot; here only refers to full automatic forwarding of one address to another, not manual Fw: right? I can&#x27;t imagine they&#x27;d break the latter
评论 #40050877 未加载
评论 #40050975 未加载
m463大约 1 年前
&quot;The big email services, gmail, yahoo, outlook and apple, are going to start tightening the thumbscrews (strict SPF, DMARK and DKIM, but also other stuff) on April 1&quot;<p>why this coordinated change? I don&#x27;t understand the root cause?<p>It seems like this might affect a large swath of normal people.<p>Now just a huge coincidence, but this would also lock people into big email providers.
评论 #40050263 未加载
评论 #40050501 未加载
loloquwowndueo大约 1 年前
Will use of Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) be affected?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.linode.com&#x2F;community&#x2F;questions&#x2F;11438&#x2F;solved-low-server-ip-reputation-when-forwarding-email-to-gmail" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.linode.com&#x2F;community&#x2F;questions&#x2F;11438&#x2F;solved-low-...</a><p>I forward a handful of email addresses from my domains to gmail, this has worked for years, and I did set up SRS a couple of years ago to solve bouncing emails.
评论 #40052166 未加载
cge大约 1 年前
To expand on why forwarding is common and important in academia, as the IT department explanations in that thread seem to misrepresent how people actually use forwarding: email is arguably the primary form of communication in academia, and important parts of academic practice assume that an address will continue to reach someone, in some way, in perpetuity.<p>Journals often put email addresses directly in text, even printed text, as the only direct contact information for authors. Scholarly conversations and collaborations often involve emailing people you vaguely know, and might not have emailed for a few years, but you probably have an address for them in your address book or some old emails. Contacting reviewers, or potential committee members for conferences, often involves discussing and cutting and pasting lists of names and email addresses. Unlike in business, in academia people often move between institutions, sometimes on the time scale of a year, while being in the same field, doing the same work, and often working with the same people. They usually want to keep receiving the same emails, and being on the same mailing lists, too.<p>The way this has typically been handled is through email forwarding: there was the understanding that, at least above a student level, you would continue to be able to forward your email address after you left for as long as you wanted, quite often the rest of your life. People would usually forward from their former institutional email addresses, not personal ones, to either their current institution, or a personal account they used to centralize everything. Thus, people could contact them with whatever old university email address they had, and they could reply with their current email address.<p>Unfortunately, university IT departments have started to ignore how academic practice differs from corporate practice, and now tend to bring in policies that fit business but not academia (another is the mangling of &#x27;external&#x27; emails: <i>most</i> of the important emails we receive are from academics at other institutions). As far as I can tell, my current university essentially treats emails the way a business would, and I&#x27;ll lose access the moment I decide to leave. They even try to change email addresses over time for people who work with us in changing contexts, without allowing forwarding (student to postdoc, intern to student, etc).<p>My personal practice is that I will not publish any institutional address unless the institution can give me assurances that my email address will continue to work indefinitely. Sometimes that means I&#x27;m listed with a personal address, or an email address for a different institution. Sometimes they are printed in important contexts, and it does look awkward. But that&#x27;s more an awkwardness for the institution, and I need to be able to ensure that I actually receive emails.
评论 #40049977 未加载
评论 #40050066 未加载
评论 #40061046 未加载
评论 #40058114 未加载
SahAssar大约 1 年前
&gt; Can I continue to forward my email to my university address [which then forwards to my personal address]?<p>What is the usecase to have the university address middleman instead of forwarding directly to the personal? And what would the first forwarder in that chain be, since its not the sender (it says forward, not send)?
评论 #40049475 未加载
评论 #40049905 未加载
xtiansimon大约 1 年前
&gt; “This is a common set up, so alumni and retirees can keep receiving mail to their university address, even though they no longer have accounts and can’t send from that address.”<p>Dammit. So I won’t be able to send and receive my personal domain emails through gmail anymore…?
评论 #40052182 未加载
Eisenstein大约 1 年前
Will this affect a catch-all forward on a domain? I own a bunch of domains and have them set so that any email sent to any address at those domains goes to my gmail account. If this stops working I will be in trouble.
评论 #40050709 未加载
评论 #40050387 未加载
theshrike79大约 1 年前
Well shit.<p>Pretty much all of my email addresses are forwarded one way or another to my &quot;main&quot; inbox.