TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Tesla pushes for $56B pay deal for Elon Musk 20240417_1621BST

24 点作者 user20180120大约 1 年前

4 条评论

chipuni大约 1 年前
Compare and contrast: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qz.com&#x2F;tesla-layoffs-confusion-elon-musk-1851416343" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qz.com&#x2F;tesla-layoffs-confusion-elon-musk-1851416343</a><p>$56 billion for Elon. Layoffs for the people who made his cars.
TheLoafOfBread大约 1 年前
Is it going to fail exactly same as last one, because board of directors is still not independent?
评论 #40074600 未加载
syntaxing大约 1 年前
From all the Musk simping, I’m gonna go on a whim that a lot people here didn’t read the verdict. At a minimum, I recommend the first handful of pages. It explicitly talks about why the judge voided this. Musk made a boat load of money to begin with from the valuation appreciation. The question was, does the extra 56B provide required incentives for Musk to do his job. The answer was determined to be no, he already owned over 20% of the company. In addition, the board was not doing its job to protect its shareholders since the board has heavy personal vested interests and relationships with Musk.
drak0n1c大约 1 年前
Good. Courts should not undermine shareholder consented contracts nor should the company be intimidated out of following through. Any minority shareholder who seriously disagreed with the 2018 compensation plan has had 6 years to trade out of the stock.
评论 #40067762 未加载