This post gives me extremely little hope.<p>One one hand… ok, let’s say it’s an engineering post written by devs for devs. OKAY, talk about Rust if you like. Devs might be more interested in the cause than the effect.<p>On the other hand… is this written for devs? Seems written for users. And I for one don’t give one half of one shit what language you use <i>as a customer</i>. It’s a post about Exchange, I don’t want to hear about new fangled language. I don’t pay you use a specific language, I pay you to deliver a specific feature… now obviously I don’t pay them in anything but time, donation, and reputation. But I think the point applies.<p>No one but Rust Evangelicals care about doing something over in Rust. There isn’t a single end feature that you can deliver in Rust but not C.<p>It reads to me like the developers are nerding out on a detail while being slightly uncommitted to the thing they “are paid to make”.<p>I have to agree with the other users that MS has already set an EOL on the feature that TB is planning to use. So… woohoo Rust?