TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Avoiding print-on-demand textbooks/technical volumes

4 点作者 denotational大约 1 年前
I quite like having hard-copies of textbooks&#x2F;technical volumes, but it seems that most academic publishers have switched to print-on-demand, as least when buying in the UK.<p>The print is generally atrocious: they typically look like a laser print of a photocopy, complete with scanning artefacts, rather than a clean print from the master. Pages start to fall out pretty quickly, and, despite the hefty premium over softback, the &quot;hardbacks&quot; are generally glue-bound in the manner of a softback; stitched lay-flat bindings seem to have completely vanished.<p>Oxford&#x2F;Cambridge&#x2F;Springer all seem to have fallen into this; MIT is one of the last I&#x27;ve found that <i>doesn&#x27;t</i> do this (yet), but unfortunately you can&#x27;t pick your publisher when buying a particular book!<p>It used to be the case that buying on Amazon would get you a print-on-demand (with &quot;Printed by Amazon&quot; in the colophon), but it seems even buying direct from the publisher isn&#x27;t enough to escape these days. In the UK, Ingram Content Group, Printforce and CPI Anthony Rowe seem to be the usual suspects doing the actual printing, regardless of who actually sells the book (Amazon&#x2F;Waterstones&#x2F;Publisher).<p>Is there a way to buy properly printed and bound copies of texts, or is this a thing of the past? Should I stick to second hand where available?

1 comment

kristianp大约 1 年前
Perhaps it&#x27;s a case of just returning the books you find to be printed on demand. You have reason to for poor quality. I&#x27;ve returned a book to Amazon due to atrocious looking, blurry print and poorly printed cover, that I assume was printed on demand.