TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigation Report [pdf]

122 点作者 cws大约 1 年前

9 条评论

er0k大约 1 年前
Kelly Shortridge&#x27;s post about the DBIR is great <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kellyshortridge.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;posts&#x2F;shortridge-makes-sense-of-verizon-dbir-2024&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kellyshortridge.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;posts&#x2F;shortridge-makes-sens...</a>
评论 #40228044 未加载
ffpip大约 1 年前
Direct link - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.verizon.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;resources&#x2F;T5d2&#x2F;reports&#x2F;2024-dbir-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.verizon.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;resources&#x2F;T5d2&#x2F;reports&#x2F;2024...</a><p>From the title, it seemed that Verizon had published a postmortem of a recent data breach incident they had
评论 #40232583 未加载
评论 #40231331 未加载
westmeal大约 1 年前
Kind of ironic they try to collect an email on this page and you simply have to hit view only.
评论 #40227207 未加载
semiquaver大约 1 年前
Submitted title is very misleading. The linked paper is called “ 2024 DBIR Data Breach Investigations Report” and is not about a Verizon breach.
评论 #40231886 未加载
ChrisArchitect大约 1 年前
Official release, other links:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.verizon.com&#x2F;about&#x2F;news&#x2F;2024-data-breach-investigations-report-vulnerability-exploitation-boom" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.verizon.com&#x2F;about&#x2F;news&#x2F;2024-data-breach-investig...</a>
itisit大约 1 年前
What is up with the glib tone featured throughout this document? To cite a few examples (there are many more):<p>Page 11: &quot;Hello, friends, and welcome to the “Results and analysis” section.&quot;<p>Page 15: &quot;Hey, you, don’t skip this section this year! We know we keep repeating, “It’s always external criminals wanting your money” alongside dated pop culture references, but we have some interesting data points to discuss this year. Does this mean External actors are not the most prevalent? No, of course they are, silly. But since we got your attention, please read on.&quot;<p>Page 37: &quot;In the cybersecurity world, or “the cyber biz,” as we call it, we certainly love our catchy terminology. Terms such as whaling, smishing, quishing, tishing, vishing, wishing, pharming, snowshoeing and plain old phishing are ever-present in the Social Engineering pattern. This makes sense because there are a lot of vectors on which we need to educate our employees and end users, and we’re positive that in another five years, there will be new ones that we will have to add to our list.&quot;
评论 #40242814 未加载
chefandy大约 1 年前
This is actually a really solid high-level report. Very well-written. Frankly, it blows my mind that it was made by a company with such infuriatingly asinine, incompetent, and ineffective support processes. I&#x27;ll bet a non-zero quantity of hiring managers that have been burned by Verizon&#x27;s support have subconsciously passed over talented candidates coming from there.
评论 #40231983 未加载
lenerdenator大约 1 年前
Breaches by attackers will continue until it becomes prohibitively expensive or dangerous for the attackers to do what they do. This isn&#x27;t something companies can do; it takes a government to do that.<p>Until then, it&#x27;s a great way to squeeze crypto out of some company to make up for the fact that your country is under sanctions tied to the US Dollar, and since it&#x27;s hard to prove to the bean counters that an attack will happen with reasonable certainty on a given system in the next quarter, good luck getting resources and priority for mitigations beyond the usual.
评论 #40226427 未加载
评论 #40232347 未加载
hk1337大约 1 年前
Geez, all 3 major mobile phone providers have had a data breach fairly recently.<p>T-Mobile (2021), AT&amp;T (2024), Verizon (2024)
评论 #40228407 未加载
评论 #40231618 未加载