TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

An Argument for Mutable Local History

12 点作者 phleet将近 13 年前

2 条评论

ezyang将近 13 年前
I think Mercurial also misses the mark for uploading patch sets which might evolve / change over a few iterations. The workflow usually looks like one user is working on only one set of changes at a time, and in order to show them to upstream they want to publish them somewhere. If these changes get edited several time, and you use a traditional Mercurial repository you end up with lots of zombie tips which you absolutely don't care about, and unless you 'hg strip' very assiduously, they keep reinfecting repositories.<p>Yes, I know it's not a supported workflow. No, sometimes, this is what I want to do.
Estragon将近 13 年前
What's the hg equivalent to git reflog?
评论 #4024524 未加载