TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A company is building a giant compressed-air battery in the Australian outback

145 点作者 uncertainrhymes大约 1 年前

17 条评论

pfdietz大约 1 年前
From a thermodynamic point of view, it should be noted that compressed air does not actually store energy! The internal energy of a compressed gas is from the kinetic energy of its molecules, and this is a function only of temperature(*).<p>What a compressed gas represents is not stored energy, but stored (negative) entropy. It is a resource that allows low grade heat to be converted to work at high efficiency. This is what&#x27;s to happen in this facility: the heat of compression is separated out and stored, then used to reheat the compressed air at discharge time. The energy is actually being stored in that thermal store.<p>But there are other ways to do this that don&#x27;t involve compressed air storage. Instead, after the heat of compression is removed and stored the compressed air could be reexpanded, recovering some of the work. This would leave the gas much colder than when it started. This <i>cold</i> could be stored (heating the gas back to its initial temperature) and the gas sent around again. To discharge, the temperature difference between the hot and cold stores could be exploited.<p>This is called &quot;pumped thermal storage&quot;. I believe Google&#x2F;Alphabet has&#x2F;had a group looking at this (called Malta). It has no geographical limitations.<p>(*) Highly compressed air will store some energy because the molecules become so crowded some energy is stored in intermolecular repulsion, but that should be a small effect in this system.
评论 #40276283 未加载
评论 #40278128 未加载
评论 #40276452 未加载
评论 #40276090 未加载
评论 #40276346 未加载
评论 #40276213 未加载
评论 #40275516 未加载
greenbit大约 1 年前
I must have missed something. Why not just use the water without the compressed air, i.e., pumped hydro? There must be some advantage, but they didn&#x27;t seem to say. I&#x27;d guess maybe if your lower reservoir were underground, the water-only would require the generator systems to be down there, too, which would mean access for people as well, and being down a mine with a small lake&#x27;s worth of water overhead seems pretty hazardous. Whereas by forcing air down to push water up, that whole below ground aspect can be almost entirely passive. Maybe?
评论 #40272288 未加载
评论 #40271688 未加载
评论 #40272493 未加载
评论 #40271803 未加载
评论 #40275474 未加载
评论 #40274046 未加载
评论 #40272410 未加载
评论 #40272275 未加载
评论 #40264782 未加载
评论 #40274410 未加载
评论 #40272512 未加载
hackerlight大约 1 年前
&gt; The next project would be Willow Rock Energy Storage Center, located near Rosamond in Kern County, California, with a capacity of 500 megawatts and the ability to run at that level for eight hours.<p>Their California battery will be 4GWh capacity with a $1.5 billion cost, which is $375&#x2F;kWh. Their Australian one will be 1.6GWh for $415 million USD, working out to be $260&#x2F;kWh. Both are more expensive than lithium ion, so I wonder what the case is for it.
评论 #40272159 未加载
评论 #40273650 未加载
评论 #40272248 未加载
评论 #40271852 未加载
评论 #40274389 未加载
评论 #40272142 未加载
评论 #40271809 未加载
评论 #40271921 未加载
评论 #40271854 未加载
评论 #40275790 未加载
评论 #40275504 未加载
评论 #40275262 未加载
评论 #40271805 未加载
评论 #40272703 未加载
mikewarot大约 1 年前
I always wondered why compressed air storage systems work against ambient pressure instead of having two tanks at high and higher pressures. This would greatly increase the density of the gas, as well as lowering the temperature differential.<p>It would take a long time to get it up to initial pressure, as there would be a lot of heat to dissipate, but then it differential mode, the gradient would be much better.
评论 #40272749 未加载
评论 #40274586 未加载
评论 #40275033 未加载
评论 #40274394 未加载
littlestymaar大约 1 年前
How do they work around the ”heat problem” with compressed air storage. When you compress the air, it heats up, and actually there&#x27;s a big part of the energy that get stored in the form of heat, not pressure. When you want the energy out the pressured air cools down during depressurization.<p>If you were able to keep the air hot the whole time the process is almost symmetrical so that&#x27;s not an issue, the “heat problem” as I call it is how do you store this heat for an extended period of time? At scale, it&#x27;s much harder to keep than just the pressurized air.<p>The prototypes I&#x27;ve seen in the past were not storing the heat, but relied on industrial fatal heat (that was lost anyway) but this also has scale problem as you don&#x27;t have that much available power except near very specific industries (NPP are an option, as are other heavy industries, but the supply is necessarily limited)
评论 #40274417 未加载
评论 #40280740 未加载
gcanyon大约 1 年前
No mention of how efficient the energy cycle is? Without checking sources, I think I&#x27;ve read that batteries and pumped hydro end up in the 80-90% range round trip? Without knowing what this method produces it&#x27;s almost pointless to consider.<p>One advantage this has (I assume) is almost limitless cycle lifespan.
评论 #40275731 未加载
tromp大约 1 年前
&gt; the system extracts heat from the air and stores it above ground for reuse. As the air goes underground, it displaces water from the cavern up a shaft into a reservoir.<p>&gt; When it’s time to discharge energy, the system releases water into the cavern, forcing the air to the surface. The air then mixes with heat that the plant stored when the air was compressing, and this hot, dense air passes through a turbine to make electricity.<p>By &quot;releases water into the cavern&quot;, do they mean simply opening the air valve to let the air (pressured by the water) come back out?
评论 #40273481 未加载
评论 #40272307 未加载
Pxtl大约 1 年前
I couldn&#x27;t see in the article - is this using natural caverns or did they excavate? I know the pilot versions of this tech generally use old salt-caverns, like the one in Germany.<p>I&#x27;m actually pretty excited about this tech - it seems like solar and wind are getting cheap faster than batteries will be able to meet the needs for grid-scale energy storage, so a cheap-but-inefficient energy storage tech is an exciting prospect. Massively overbuild the solar&#x2F;wind and use these things to defer the overflow.
watershawl大约 1 年前
This is a good solution (storing in rock) to get around the heat and corrosion (from water) that above-ground tanks go through when storing compressed air.
ourmandave大约 1 年前
Well this changes the whole look and feel of future Bartertown entirely.<p>They probably won&#x27;t even <i>have</i> a Thunderdome. =(
评论 #40281814 未加载
foreigner大约 1 年前
How does the air &quot;push the water up&quot;? What mechanism prevents the air from simply bubbling up through the water column? I&#x27;m assuming some kind of valve or piston, but would be interested to see what it looks like.
评论 #40272543 未加载
评论 #40272411 未加载
评论 #40271890 未加载
评论 #40271915 未加载
masteruvpuppetz大约 1 年前
I found another technique quite fascinating.. When electricity is surplus, spin large disk-shaped rocks levitated by magnets in a vacuumed enclosure. Use this spinning motion to create electricity when required.
评论 #40273062 未加载
coryfklein大约 1 年前
What happens when you get a leak in a random seal in the chamber deep under ground, does all the compressed air escape? How do you ensure such a large reservoir stays air-tight for 20 years?
ck2大约 1 年前
Why not lift super heavy but cheap objects like rocks or dirt and then let gravity be your battery?
评论 #40275942 未加载
评论 #40275929 未加载
psadri大约 1 年前
While at it… they could try to extract some atmospheric CO2 from the more concentrated air.
jimnotgym大约 1 年前
What stops the air from just bubbling up the water pipe?
评论 #40273104 未加载
评论 #40274540 未加载
0xE1337DAD大约 1 年前
Totho, has graduated from snap bows.