TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Declares the End of the World Wide Web

29 点作者 keskival12 个月前

7 条评论

beardyw12 个月前
At what period of time was the web supposed to be at its best? In the 90s there was little valuable content and security was nonexistent. Today there is far more real content than ever. Some wish I would install an app, but I don't, and it still works. I've had a website running a business since 2002. It's no problem. I wish people would grow up and realise that things don't stay the same.
johnea12 个月前
We can only hope that this is actually declaring that goggle is obsolete...
rapson12 个月前
My question is where will ai get new information without the web
jauntywundrkind12 个月前
Another absolutely off the rails site full of perpetual nonsense crazy town that gets posted 8 times a month. It&#x27;s ridiculous that there&#x27;s no noospheric defense or warning when the source is fucking ape shit wild. Ever submission has to be re-litigated again, as though they deserve full credibility.<p>See also reason.com, quilette.com, I dunno, a half dozen others.
评论 #40436901 未加载
8organicbits12 个月前
Yet, it&#x27;s easier than ever to build a website of your own. The web is still out there, but Google can&#x27;t find it. I think Google&#x27;s incentives no longer align with my own so I am increasingly de-Googling my life.
评论 #40416867 未加载
评论 #40436719 未加载
thro112 个月前
First JS now AI: <i>&quot;a wall between&quot;</i>. Both JS and AI are for <i>context loosers</i> (you can&#x27;t have memex). Clue: you don&#x27;t need JS - but advertisers do, you had to use it because browsers were broken and are kept broken ( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;groups.google.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;chromium.org&#x2F;g&#x2F;blink-dev&#x2F;c&#x2F;zIg2KC7PyH0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;groups.google.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;chromium.org&#x2F;g&#x2F;blink-dev&#x2F;c&#x2F;zIg2K...</a> etc.). Faster JS engine is irrevelant, but extensions as we had before in Firefox, sacrified for that and Google money, wasn&#x27;t.
评论 #40416861 未加载
评论 #40436718 未加载
fuzzfactor12 个月前
The article&#x27;s top comment is definitely worthwhile:<p>Jeff Cunningham 16 hours ago<p>I have a web-server that has been running since 2008. It started out as a vanity website, written back in the days when a large number of websites belonging to individuals, before the monetization of the web. As that process developed, privacy issues began to rear up and my site went through a series of contractions, to the point were I almost shut it down. But it remained useful to me for several reasons. First, I had written a number of web applications that were very useful to me, personally. Writing a computer application for particular platforms takes a lot of work and must be constantly monitored for compatibility with continually evolving operating system changes. Web applications put that burden on browsers, who provide an applications programming interface which works (pretty much) across various platforms. My applications work on my native Linux machines, my wife’s Mac, our phones and tablets, etc. They enable me to interact with my own records, resources, references, stream my own music, transfer large files to and from wherever I am in the world – without Google, Amazon, Facebook, or any other corporate or government entity looking over my shoulder. As security became an issue, I changed the site to require authorization to access most of it. The existence of most of it became invisible without authorization. But I left a small number of publicly accessible pages on the site. I had a pretty decent weather station I’d built and had online since I started the site. And I published some codes I’d written that a few people found interesting and led to some email discussions (and one exchange wherein a Chinese student tried to get me to solve his take-home Lisp programming final exam problem for him). I regularly monitored my server logs – a record of the request traffic it receives. As the monetization of search took off my server traffic exploded. A large amount of it was the big search engines – both foreign and domestic. It got to be ridiculous. In any given period, only a very small amount of the traffic was from “real people” (me, my family and friends, and an occasional stranger steered there mysteriously by search); all the rest was search engines scraping the site – which changed rarely. There are methods one uses which are supposed to control them somewhat, and the big commercial domestic ones seem to obey them. Most of the foreign ones just ignore them. But the biggest growth in traffic I saw from about the mid-twenty-teens was from hackers and from commercial operations looking for ways to exploit my site or data and sell it. I spent a lot of time learning how to track and classify these and the hackers. The emergence of geolocation techniques (which use multiple world-wide servers to triangulate actual latitude, longitude locations of IP sources based on transit delays) helped tremendously in this endeavor. China, Russia, the UK, and, curiously, locations around Washington, D.C., turn out to be the largest single sources of attacks on my U.S. located site. But there are waves of attack origin that temporarily roll through (lately, Ukraine, Hanoi, Tehran, Sweden and Hamburg, Germany have been prominent). How my comment here ties in with this article is this: a while ago I relaxed my constraints on the big search engines. And what I discovered was that, while they came back around and sniffed at it, they just moved on without bothering to index it. They simply don’t care about individual sites like mine anymore. They would if I was posting ads on it. Or cross-linking to sites that posted ads. Or selling something. Or buying something. But just to put up information about various topics without any of that? Sorry, not interesting anymore. I am a non-entity to Goggle (in more ways than one). They just are not interested in the content anymore – not if will not be useful to generate clicks to their advertisers. And I realized that this is what I’ve been noticing with search for quite sometime. It is very difficult to find non-monetized websites with search. There was a time when you could if you dove deep – meaning kept going through page after page of links. Eventually you’d get past the heavy advertising and find a few real, interesting topical pages. Now, after several pages the search engines simply say you’ve reached the end of their search results. The end of the Internet! It used to be a joke. Now it’s a reality. At a time when there has never been more websites online it has never been shallower. Last edited 16 hours ago by Jeff Cunningham
评论 #40418396 未加载
评论 #40406006 未加载
评论 #40421927 未加载
评论 #40436925 未加载
评论 #40436723 未加载