I don't really see this as being a particularly big deal.<p>Editors overstepped the mark on very short single-paragraph articles by reproducing content in full rather than providing a short summary or blurb. The sites administration has now been made aware of it and have, rightfully, since fixed it. Their intentions seem honest as a link was provided to the original content. Hanlon's razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.