TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Understanding "Financialization" and How to Defeat It

22 点作者 qp1112 个月前

5 条评论

jameslk12 个月前
This article has a lot of opinions (it’s from a union organization) without a lot of citations. In the 1970s, a lot of things changed (e.g. see this discussion[0]). Seems this article wants to focus on its narrative of what happened in the 1970s.<p>0. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25188457">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25188457</a>
jbm12 个月前
&gt; How to Defeat It<p>Apparently this is by creating unions and a postal bank. I have no idea how we get from here to there, I wish they had concentrated on that.
评论 #40487524 未加载
评论 #40487496 未加载
jcranmer12 个月前
&gt; If that focus on immediate shareholder value means the quality of products suffers, the environment is damaged, that workers are treated poorly, or even if it comes at the expense of the long-term sustainability of the business, that&#x27;s too bad! Today’s profits are the only thing that matter in a world of financialization.<p>... is this trying to argue that corporations cared about all of that stuff <i>before</i> financialization? Because that is what it seems like it&#x27;s trying to argue. And as anyone who&#x27;s done even a cursory glance at the history of the 19th century well knows, corporations were far more rapacious than they are today.
anonydsfsfs12 个月前
...is that the entire article? This reads like the thesis statement for a much longer article or book.
评论 #40487481 未加载
zooq_ai12 个月前
What a dumb article
评论 #40487590 未加载