TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Psychological tricks rich people use to look generous without spending more

95 点作者 Kortaggio12 个月前

10 条评论

xg1512 个月前
&gt; <i>[1] The scarf&#x2F;coat example is from this LessWrong article, based on the original paper Christopher K. Hsee, “Less Is Better: When Low-Value Options Are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options”</i><p>Yep, somehow knew it had to be LessWrong the moment the post mentioned &quot;social value&quot;. That scarf&#x2F;coat experiment and really the entire concept sounds like exactly the things that some EA folks would get hyped up about.
评论 #40558285 未加载
Quinzel12 个月前
I am not “rich”, but a psychological trick I use when I’m out with one or two friends is that I always make sure I buy the first drink, or first entree etc. Basically I just make sure that I provide the first “gift”. The reason being that I know that I will most likely get back in return favours that far exceed what I initially fronted up with.<p>The most recent example of me doing this was Friday night. I paid $6 for my friends drink, and then in return, he bought me dinner, and then also paid for me to go bowling. So in return for my $6 spent, I got about $50 of value in return.<p>I been doing this since I was a kid. I grew up in poverty, and I think it’s like a behavioural adaptation I acquired because it was a way for me to get things I needed. I knew as a kid, that adults valued generosity. I didn’t have a lot to give because I was poor, so what I would do instead was craft handmade gifts, pick flowers for people, write nicely worded letters to people, or I would do chores for random people without being asked, and often I found people would return the favour by providing something in return.<p>It wasn’t until I studied social psychology as an elective in my first degree that I realised I was using the rule of reciprocity to gain an advantage. Since realising the social convention behind it, I still do it to my advantage, but I would say now days, I do do it with more intention - therefore there are times where I do not exploit this human vulnerability because I know I am actually socially more advantaged than the other person.<p>When I am in social situations where I know someone is far wealthier than I am, instead of offering them tangible gifts like buying a drink, I actually prefer to stroke their ego’s, and make them feel interesting and important, and I also am happy to allow them to feel socially superior to me. I don’t care if they view me as lower in the pecking order, because as long as they think that I admire them, they’re more likely to provide gifts, like buying me drinks etc… again, it’s an adaptation of the reciprocity thing, and something I learned to do as a kid.
评论 #40558178 未加载
评论 #40557960 未加载
评论 #40558043 未加载
评论 #40558018 未加载
评论 #40558154 未加载
评论 #40558167 未加载
评论 #40558091 未加载
评论 #40559673 未加载
评论 #40558476 未加载
评论 #40558603 未加载
评论 #40558038 未加载
pavel_lishin12 个月前
This seems to be more about how to spend less while shopping, rather than psychological tricks or generosity.
评论 #40558021 未加载
osigurdson12 个月前
Author assumes the only reason people buy a truck is for &quot;signalling&quot;.
评论 #40558064 未加载
评论 #40558002 未加载
评论 #40557988 未加载
评论 #40558568 未加载
评论 #40558006 未加载
jacknews12 个月前
The title seems misleading, it should just be &#x27;better ways to buy things&#x2F;spend your money&#x27; or similar.<p>I do like the ethos that you should carefully consider&#x2F;choose the things you own, and then look after them, repair them etc. They then carry the story of their ownership, and become much more valuable to you (witness the &#x27;I repaired my broken mug&#x27; story on HN this last week). Our current semi-disposable fast-fashion money-go-round mode of consumption needs to stop.
alistairSH12 个月前
<i>I get more social value from the scarf by being seen as more generous, without actually spending more money, so I can pretending to be rich while being a cheap asshole!</i><p>Um, not necessarily. This assumes the receiver has no concept of the giver’s budget, which is rarely true. And also assumes the receiver cares about the cash value of the gift receives, instead of either the motivation for giving or the utility of the item.<p>This whole post stuck me as borderline disordered. Is this really the way rich people think? Sounds miserable to go through life being so calculating about everything. I’m “rich” by many measures (but nowhere near senior FAANG engineer rich) and I’d much rather just enjoy the life I’ve fallen into.
评论 #40558197 未加载
评论 #40559712 未加载
Havoc12 个月前
&gt; Smart fridges, smart lightbulbs, and smart toothbrushes are also about precision: you gotta be a smart human to operate anything more complex than a can opener these days.<p>As someone who tinkered unsuccessfully with zigbee stuff this weekend i feel attacked
jc612 个月前
This stuff their assistants do for them. To understand how they use signalling be aware of The Theory of the Leisure Class.
评论 #40558007 未加载
评论 #40558035 未加载
credit_guy12 个月前
&gt; A brand is totally dematerialized—Harvard is not the buildings and libraries—every school has those.<p>Yeah, no. Harvard has a $50 billion endowment, other schools don’t.
deadbabe12 个月前
A neat trick is to “pledge” to make some large donation then never really get around to it.