TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Arch Linux vs. Ubuntu, Thoughts?

4 点作者 shivc12 个月前
I loved Arch, but the constant issues really got me to use Ubuntu for slightly more stable work since I was spending more time on working issues than actual work.<p>How has your experience been?<p>Also have you faced boot issues when dual booting with windows? as in a blank screen and pc not POSTing?

7 条评论

joe20011 个月前
Use Debian Testing. Packages up-to-date. Compare the latest Ubuntu and Debian Testing:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;distrowatch.com&#x2F;dwres.php?firstlist=debian&amp;secondlist=ubuntu&amp;firstversions=1&amp;secondversions=1&amp;resource=compare-packages&amp;view=all&amp;refresh=Refresh" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;distrowatch.com&#x2F;dwres.php?firstlist=debian&amp;secondlis...</a><p>And I repeat what I said before: don&#x27;t be fooled by the name of the release - &quot;Testing&quot;. The name &quot;Testing&quot; exists due to an orthodox approach of Debian community that only the Debian stable can use &quot;stable&quot;.
heartag12 个月前
I&#x27;ve been using Arch for over a decade at this point. It&#x27;s broken on me a handful of times and needed a live USB to recover, but overall has been incredibly robust.<p>My advice is to try everything out and then use what you like. Ubuntu is great and stable.
Alifatisk12 个月前
I don&#x27;t have any experience with Arch but I can tell you that I&#x27;ve had tiny servers run Ubuntu for a whole year straight with no issues (except one incident where apt couldn&#x27;t pull updates from internet because some files got corrupted somehow, but the solution was easy and I didn&#x27;t lose anything).
评论 #40561358 未加载
stop5012 个月前
Desktop arch and servers debian stable. Works for me. dualboot was often broken by windows, so i have moved only signleboot linux. I only occasional use windows in a vm which i download when i need it.
评论 #40561360 未加载
znpy12 个月前
Neither of those, frankly.<p>Have used Ubuntu for years, got really fed up with they constantly changing their stuff and messing my setup. Snap was the last straw for me.<p>I tried Arch briefly, was not impressed at all. It doesn&#x27;t look like a reliable system at all. All of my friends using have had multiple major issues, almost routinely. I&#x27;m not a teenager anymore so I can&#x27;t waste my time fixing other people&#x27;s poor choices in systems development.<p>I&#x27;ve switched to Fedora on the desktop (XFCE) a couple of years ago and it&#x27;s been a dream so far. The system is rock solid, it&#x27;s routinely updated, it&#x27;s fast and light.<p>On my home server I&#x27;m moved from RHEL 8 (developer subscription) to RockyLinux 9 (RHEL derivative). I&#x27;ve discovered RHEL for work and it&#x27;s been a pleasure... Rock solid, reliable system.<p>Try fedora, you won&#x27;t regret it.<p>&gt; Also have you faced boot issues when dual booting with windows? as in a blank screen and pc not POSTing?<p>Haven&#x27;t used Windows in ~15 years, can&#x27;t say.
评论 #40560456 未加载
评论 #40561403 未加载
lordkrandel12 个月前
Arch, rolling release is just superior stuff for everyday use.
cranberryturkey12 个月前
i haven&#x27;t had any big issues with arch, i use it on my laptop and i use ubuntu lts for servers.
评论 #40561365 未加载