High resolution logo for any domain or stock ticker

This is a great backlink play, kudos

<p><pre><code> The page you were looking for doesn&#x27;t exist. You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved. </code></pre> After typing something in the box and clicking button.

I like this! Curious if you pre-cache all public tickers or if you are trying to do this real-time using crawlers at time of request?

I’m seeing a square favicon&#x2F;app icon, not really an official company logo. Should there not be an option for the actual logo?

There should be some sort of message if there&#x27;s no results. It just clears the input box.

I use something similar that&#x27;s offered for free: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;clearbit.com&#x2F;logo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;clearbit.com&#x2F;logo</a><p>It would be interesting to know how your solution is different.<p>Feature request: offer high resolution vector format like SVG.

I thought this would be an AI app that would rely on the domain name and&#x2F;or website crawl to infer an aesthetic, and then create a prompt that would be fed to a generative image transformer

The result for FORD is a broken image:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;logo.synthfinance.com&#x2F;v&#x2F;ticker&#x2F;FORD" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;logo.synthfinance.com&#x2F;v&#x2F;ticker&#x2F;FORD</a>

It doesn&#x27;t appear to work for google subdomains. For keep.google.com gives a very blurry google logo with the edges clipped off. For mail.google.com the result is a broken image link.

What is the source for the logos? They are sometimes jpg with bad compression artifacts.

Free!*<p>* User assumes all liability for use as these are almost exclusively registered trademarks.

So it seems that you found a database of PNG images associated with stock tickers, and added favicon scraping, and then put it together with the false promise of &quot;high resolution logos&quot;, when I get severely mixed results and a lot of errors when it can&#x27;t handle a favicon.<p>I mean, it works, good job at that at least, but it doesn&#x27;t work well and it doesn&#x27;t seem useful.