TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Synapse bankruptcy trustee says $85M of customer savings is missing

82 点作者 svggrfgovgf12 个月前

7 条评论

hn_throwaway_9912 个月前
I&#x27;ve got to believe more regulation is coming after the Synapse implosion. For the unaware, this is generally how this process works with fintechs:<p>1. You have the underlying FDIC ensured partner banks. However, to be clear, FDIC insurance only covers if <i>the bank</i> fails. Synapse itself isn&#x27;t covered by FDIC insurance.<p>2. Synapse operates as a middleman, where they provide &quot;ledgering tech&quot; (more on that below) and APIs that connect to the underlying partner bank. For example, say you&#x27;re a startup that offers business services to sole proprietors and small businesses, and you want to be able to let your customers open a bank account. You connect with Synapse and a partner bank, so that you can use Synapse APIs from your website to open accounts for your customers.<p>3. The important point, though, is at the partner bank there is usually a single &quot;FBO&quot; (for benefit of) account on the bank&#x27;s core banking system. So when end customer opens a new account, a new account isn&#x27;t actually created in the partner bank&#x27;s core banking system. Instead, Synapse keeps track of all the individual customers funds separately in their own ledger that they keep.<p>It appears here that there is a big discrepancy between what Synapse&#x27;s ledgers say they owe end customers, and what is actually stored with the partner banks. And that&#x27;s the part where I think regulation is coming. There are almost no checks right now to ensure that the ledgers of these &quot;bank API middlemen&quot; (and there are a bunch of them) actually reconcile with the underlying funds kept at these partner banks. And many of these fintechs tout &quot;FDIC insurance&quot;, but again that only protects you if an underlying bank goes out of business, not if the uninsured middleman is doing bad math.<p>And, to be honest, I think regulation would be a great thing here. A lot of these &quot;banking-as-a-service&quot; middle men <i>did</i> provide a lot of tech value (e.g. easy to access APIs - think similary to what Stripe provided for card payments but for banking), but apparently played fast and loose with actually keeping track of customer funds correctly.
评论 #40622019 未加载
zer00eyz12 个月前
Does this trigger the FDIC to step in? Was Synapse FDIC insured or just the underlying banks? Or is synapse &quot;shadow banking&quot; gone wrong?<p>I don&#x27;t know why this isnt bigger news, and I dont get why there aren&#x27;t clear answers.
评论 #40621630 未加载
评论 #40621272 未加载
评论 #40621532 未加载
评论 #40624501 未加载
belter12 个月前
Related: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;bBUkajbg688" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;bBUkajbg688</a>
thebruce87m12 个月前
“Customer savings” are missing… or in other words the banks money?<p>Reminds me of the Mitchell and Webb skit about identity theft: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CS9ptA3Ya9E" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CS9ptA3Ya9E</a>
RecycledEle12 个月前
I predict the guilty will pay someone off and never be charged.<p>If I am wrong and they are charged, they will be fined&#x2F;pay restitution of less than $5 million and spend 6 months or less in jail.
pkulak12 个月前
Is this why Copper shut down? Damn, there goes my 70 bucks I had in there. And they keep sending me emails telling me to link a bank account. Yeah, good one guys. I’m just gonna give all my bank details to the company that has just now proven to be totally incompetent and untrustworthy. You can mail me a check.
valcron100012 个月前
Welp, goodbye to my 10 USD