TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Waymo issues software and mapping recall after robotaxi crashes into a pole

38 点作者 parker-346111 个月前

7 条评论

mehlmao11 个月前
If self-driving vehicles are tested on public streets, all data generated should be public. Companies should be cooperating, not competing, on "don't hit telephone poles" and "don't run over children".
评论 #40662050 未加载
评论 #40663117 未加载
评论 #40661978 未加载
LeifCarrotson11 个月前
After some sleuthing and Geoguessring, here&#x27;s the alley where it happened:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;maps.app.goo.gl&#x2F;UNUzQn686ESYWbfo7" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;maps.app.goo.gl&#x2F;UNUzQn686ESYWbfo7</a><p>Further south of the pin, by the section of the alley with stripes on the pavement behind the garages for 842 N 6th Ave (but not on 6th or 7th, on an unnamed alley between the two).<p>Let me repeat - it&#x27;s an alley. The Google Maps car didn&#x27;t even go down that road (though it looks to have been under construction when the Maps car went through).<p>Without exclusing Waymo (they had their car do something dangerous and stupid) this is the kind of pseudo-off-road parking lot&#x2F;driveway&#x2F;construction zone nav stuff that&#x27;s really hard to get right, and almost requires AGI.<p>I think the real error was not the damage score but the planning algorithm that directed it to drive down and to continue through that alley.<p>I think we&#x27;ll soon get to (if we&#x27;re not there already) a form of level 2 driver aids or level 3 geofenced self driving (highway only?) that&#x27;s safer than average human drivers. I think we&#x27;re a long way from self-driving cars that will assign a low damage score and drive over an empty cardboard box in an unmarked, unmapped private alley, and we may never get there. But that doesn&#x27;t mean Waymo can&#x27;t or shouldn&#x27;t exist, it means they need to shut down the car and delegate to a human when they&#x27;re stuck and not not on public, mapped, confirmed clear roads. Maybe that means it can&#x27;t pick you up from the back of the Chic Fil A parking lot or the entrance to the mall that&#x27;s an island in a quarter mile of private parking lots and you have to go to the nearest parking spot on the actual road, but if the alternative is assigning damage scores to stuff in alleys that&#x27;s probably for the best.
rvnx11 个月前
I&#x27;m sure they did it out of caution, considering their excellent track record. Love this company, would like to see them expanding.
评论 #40661724 未加载
评论 #40661944 未加载
bastawhiz11 个月前
This is the most interesting part, in my opinion:<p>&gt; Waymo’s recall was deployed by the company’s engineers at the central depot where the vehicles return for regular maintenance and testing. It was not through an over-the-air software update, like some of Tesla’s recent recalls.<p>I&#x27;d be interested to learn more about why the updates are manual, and also whether the map data is fully local to the vehicle. Tesla obviously does the polar opposite of this, and it seems to have at least some degree of success, but Tesla&#x27;s approach has always seemed like it would be subject to some bad potential failure modes in my mind.<p>How much data does this amount to? Gigs? Terabytes?<p>On the same note, I&#x27;m curious about what data gets pulled from the map versus sensor data. The car seems to have used map data instead of sensor data (unless I&#x27;m misunderstanding?). Whether there&#x27;s a curb seems to be exactly the sort of thing you could rely on sensors for, mostly because you also already need to look for obstructions which necessarily can&#x27;t be in map data.
评论 #40661572 未加载
评论 #40661419 未加载
评论 #40661739 未加载
评论 #40666852 未加载
Animats11 个月前
&quot;<i>The update corrects an error in the software that “assigned a low damage score” to the telephone pole.&quot;</i><p>What did it get classified as? What&#x27;s a Waymo allowed to hit?
评论 #40661738 未加载
评论 #40661958 未加载
评论 #40666848 未加载
评论 #40665251 未加载
评论 #40661816 未加载
评论 #40661757 未加载
wmf11 个月前
I assume Waymo is continuously improving the safety of their software. It&#x27;s bizarre to classify two of these updates as &quot;recalls&quot; but not the others.
webwielder211 个月前
&quot;Recall&quot; really needs to be retired as a term.
评论 #40661624 未加载
评论 #40661901 未加载