TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why are so many books listed as "Borrow Unavailable" at the Internet Archive?

67 点作者 FMecha11 个月前

6 条评论

JKCalhoun11 个月前
I&#x27;ve never taken the internet for granted — have scraped anything and everything I have found interesting. I suggest everyone do the same.<p>(As a bonus, you don&#x27;t even need internet for the content you have backed up.)
评论 #40683786 未加载
评论 #40683069 未加载
client411 个月前
It&#x27;s curious how corporations try to litigate business models that struggle to survive the Internet age, enabling places like Anna&#x27;s Archive to pop-up and do more damage than simply leaving the IA alone.
评论 #40682421 未加载
评论 #40682357 未加载
dfxm1211 个月前
It&#x27;s frustrating that there&#x27;s no published date on this page. I&#x27;m just particularly curious as to if this is related to yesterday&#x27;s SCOTUS opinions or something else. Granted, searching legal decisions is admittedly not a strength of mine, and this might be trivial to some.<p>A quick search on Wikipedia suggests that a &quot;final judgement&quot; was made in August of last year, but also that it was appealed last year. Is this being posted now because the appeal now over?
评论 #40682272 未加载
justin_oaks11 个月前
Am I the only one disgusted by the number of &quot;University of ___ Press&quot; or &quot;___ University Press&quot; entries in the list of publishers that got books taken down?<p>I suppose I shouldn&#x27;t be surprised that universities aren&#x27;t the bastions of knowledge sharing that we want them to be. I just think it&#x27;s sad.
评论 #40682602 未加载
评论 #40682545 未加载
评论 #40682358 未加载
评论 #40682844 未加载
hosh11 个月前
There was a good article posted previously here on HN about the lawsuit.<p>There is something in the current framework that allows libraries to lend out digital copies — by having purchased a physical copy. They can lend out one digital copy for each physical copy they hold.<p>What Internet Archive did was, during Covid, opened up lending to exceed the physical copies they held. They did not ask the copyright holders when they did this.<p>They broke the law, and their case has no legal merit. Their argument was to appeal to public opinion. The results of the lawsuit may jeopardize their main mission.<p>I really respected the IA, but how they are going about this is dishonest.
评论 #40682670 未加载
KolmogorovComp11 个月前
Is this court decision applied globally or only to US users? If the former, why?