TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Stable Diffusion 3 banned on CivitAI due to license

44 点作者 samspenc11 个月前

3 条评论

jsheard11 个月前
&gt; we are temporarily banning [...] all models or LoRAs trained on content created with outputs from SD3 based models.<p>Again we see this bizarre standard where the licensing of AI model output is taken more seriously than the licensing of any other type of training data. CivitAI is absolutely filled with LoRAs trained on the work of artists who refuse to license it for that purpose, but only LoRAs based on the output of an AI model with a restrictive license are over the line apparently?<p>It&#x27;s a similar story with LLMs, e.g. OpenAI scooping up unlicensed data to train their models, but then turning around and proclaiming that the license of ChatGPTs output forbids using it to train a competing model. The license of data used for training either matters or it doesn&#x27;t, you can&#x27;t have it both ways.
评论 #40710726 未加载
评论 #40710892 未加载
SV_BubbleTime11 个月前
Should be banned on performance.<p>It was obvious with how many times they said “SAFETY” (lobotomized) during their press releases and comments, but I’m still pretty surprised just how bad it is.<p>If you haven’t seen it, the first image is the now-iconic SD3 unofficial picture.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;AIfreakout&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1dekkbz&#x2F;why_is_sd3_so_bad_at_generating_girls_lying_on&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;AIfreakout&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1dekkbz&#x2F;why_is_...</a><p>Luckily for open source and local running, Lumina and PixArt are catching up.
评论 #40710643 未加载
评论 #40710732 未加载
cma11 个月前
Ok to train on human outputs but not model outputs?