TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Where did you go, Ms. Pac-Man?

137 点作者 glhaynes11 个月前

13 条评论

ndiddy11 个月前
There&#x27;s a good summary of the legal issues surrounding Ms. Pac-Man here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pacman.fandom.com&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;History_of_Ms._Pac-Man_legal_issues" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pacman.fandom.com&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;History_of_Ms._Pac-Man_legal_...</a> .<p>Essentially, the game was originally created as an unofficial upgrade to Pac-Man arcade games by a third party, GCC. GCC then licensed Ms. Pac-Man to Namco, with a contract stipulating that they were due royalties for any Ms. Pac-Man coin operated games, as well as any electronic distribution of Ms. Pac-Man. Namco then forgot about the contract after Ms. Pac-Man went out of production in the mid-80s, meaning that the extremely broad &quot;electronic distribution&quot; term was never renegotiated.<p>In the early 2000s, Namco started releasing Ms. Pac-Man&#x2F;Galaga multigame cabinets without paying GCC&#x27;s successors royalties, so they sued Namco. The arbitrator decided that &quot;coin operated game&quot; meant that GCC&#x27;s successors were due royalties from any Ms. Pac-Man machine with a coin slot, but not machines without coin slots meant for home use. More importantly, they decided that because the contract defined &quot;electronic distribution&quot; as &quot;any use in which the game is broadcast or in any other way transmitted to other receiving devices&quot;, this meant that GCC&#x27;s successors were due royalites for rereleases of Ms. Pac-Man on any device with internet connectivity.<p>Around 2018, Namco reached out to GCC&#x27;s successors in an attempt to buy out their royalty rights. Before negotiations completed, AtGames, a company that mostly focuses on rereleasing old games, significantly outbid Namco. Namco contacted AtGames saying that if AtGames didn&#x27;t rescind their offer, Namco would permanently stop licensing their titles to AtGames and ensure that &quot;there is zero income stream delivered pursuant [to the GCC] agreement&quot;.<p>Since that point, the only new Ms. Pac-Man rereleases have been standalone games that fall under the &quot;not coin operated&quot; loophole. In 2022, they delisted most existing Ms. Pac-Man rereleases, likely to cut AtGames off from receiving any Ms. Pac-Man royalties at all. Additionally, Namco has started editing the Ms. Pac-Man character out of rereleases of other Pac-Man games in favor of a new &quot;Pac-Mom&quot; character (likely as an attempt to reduce awareness of Ms. Pac-Man to further devalue AtGames&#x27;s purchase).
评论 #40713168 未加载
CobrastanJorji11 个月前
As much as I&#x27;ve never heard of, don&#x27;t care about, and had no particular trust in the &quot;Pac-Man Museum+&quot; videogame, I am nonetheless disappointed in them for altering their history without credit or footnote. I expect more from Museum-branded shovelware.
评论 #40716318 未加载
egypturnash11 个月前
Huh. I feel like a Ms Pac-Man&#x2F;Galaga multigame in the corner of a laundromat or restaurant is really the most common way for anyone to run into Pac-Man now, and yet here&#x27;s Namco trying to retcon her out of existence.
评论 #40712706 未加载
评论 #40717552 未加载
评论 #40718293 未加载
mattigames11 个月前
A few years ago I made a pac-man clone with unity for android where the only difference was that you controled Pac-man with your left thumb and Ms Pac-man with your right thumb, called Pac-men if I recall correctly, it was a bit frustating but the innovative mechanics was a bit of fun by itself, both could eat ghost when powered-up, the ghosts movement logic was the classic one too (so it only took into account one the first pac-man to chose paths), not much later it was taken down from the play store for trademark infrigement, in my naiveness I assumed nobody care about such thing due beign such an old game and forgot to check beforehand, boy was I wrong. I considered changed the sprites and release again with a different name&#x2F;ip but lazyness took the best of me, probably wouldn&#x27;t have catched anybodys atentton with some other name anyway.
AdmiralAsshat11 个月前
I never noticed that none of the official art for Ms. Pac-Man includes her beauty mark, which is kinda key to the sprite. It&#x27;s the only thing that distinguishes her from regular Pac-Man other than the bow.
评论 #40710975 未加载
评论 #40711017 未加载
crawsome11 个月前
The Drawn Together reference in the article was totally unexpected but welcome.
Physkal11 个月前
Drawn together was so good I wish it had more of a following, it deserved more seasons.
busterarm11 个月前
In the words of one Johnny Blue Jeans...<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=aqZo3pC6h68" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=aqZo3pC6h68</a>
masswerk11 个月前
My favorite variant is probably Pac-Gal [1] (a hack from 1981, sometimes also attributed Uchida, 1982) – it doesn&#x27;t get more &#x27;80s than this.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gamesdatabase.org&#x2F;game&#x2F;arcade&#x2F;pac-gal" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gamesdatabase.org&#x2F;game&#x2F;arcade&#x2F;pac-gal</a>
axilmar11 个月前
It&#x27;s a shame really that Namco didn&#x27;t want to pay a lot of money for the rights of Ms Pac Man.<p>I don&#x27;t understand their approach.<p>They clearly have a lot more money in their disposal than AtGames. Why not buy the second most significant character in the Pacman franchise?
toast011 个月前
&gt; After all, this would be like if Nintendo re-released a Super Mario game and swapped out Princess Peach for a Princess Pineapple or Princess Pumpkin and just acted like it wasn’t weird.<p>Yeah, that&#x27;d be weird, but swapping Princess Peach for Princess Toadstool was fine?
评论 #40711190 未加载
评论 #40711208 未加载
评论 #40711138 未加载
评论 #40717991 未加载
jmull11 个月前
Ms. was a better game.
johnchristopher11 个月前
Totally OT but: Godverdomme, why can&#x27;t I right click those images of vintage ads :((((.
评论 #40712378 未加载
评论 #40711675 未加载
评论 #40712743 未加载