TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

531 点作者 FionnMc11 个月前

24 条评论

dankai11 个月前
The current draft would cover every kind of service that allows people to exchange information so that every DM you send on reddit, twitter, discord, steam, ... would be have to be scanned. Not even the most totalitarian governments on this planet have tried to implement something like this. Also it sounds extremely illusory that the people exchanging CSAM wouldn&#x27;t simply switch to private services knowing their messages on public services are scanned.<p>&quot;... As services which enable direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service, such as chat and similar functions as part of gaming, image-sharing and video-hosting are equally at risk of misuse, they should also be covered by this Regulation. &quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cdn.netzpolitik.org&#x2F;wp-upload&#x2F;2024&#x2F;05&#x2F;2024-05-28_Council_Presidency_LEWP_CSAR_Compromise-texts_9093.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cdn.netzpolitik.org&#x2F;wp-upload&#x2F;2024&#x2F;05&#x2F;2024-05-28_Cou...</a>
评论 #40715744 未加载
评论 #40717861 未加载
评论 #40715441 未加载
评论 #40712887 未加载
评论 #40717127 未加载
linuxandrew11 个月前
Signal Foundation has already said they would leave the EU if Chat Control goes ahead.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mastodon.world&#x2F;@Mer__edith&#x2F;112535616774247450" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mastodon.world&#x2F;@Mer__edith&#x2F;112535616774247450</a>
评论 #40711809 未加载
评论 #40711415 未加载
评论 #40711566 未加载
评论 #40711380 未加载
FredPret11 个月前
This is why the roles of the major players in society (government, monopolies) need to be circumscribed.<p>Large organizations will always try to grow in size and power.<p>We need some sort of human right for digital privacy to make this sort of thing illegal.
评论 #40711550 未加载
评论 #40711430 未加载
评论 #40711956 未加载
评论 #40720625 未加载
评论 #40711781 未加载
评论 #40714727 未加载
评论 #40711892 未加载
评论 #40712122 未加载
评论 #40711621 未加载
评论 #40711444 未加载
belter11 个月前
EU is, and always was, a compensation job for failed national politicians at their respective national levels. It&#x27;s the trade horse for allowing your party buddies to take over the government jobs.<p>EU politicians should keep their over inflated salaries, and stick to what they are good at. Meeting with Google and Microsoft lobbyists at the best Brussels luxury restaurants.
评论 #40712079 未加载
评论 #40711423 未加载
评论 #40722937 未加载
评论 #40715872 未加载
radicalbyte11 个月前
I already kicked up a shit here in NL together with a few other well connected people (with success) but it&#x27;s a little frustrating that there&#x27;s little more to do other than hope that nerds in other EU countries can make a difference.
评论 #40713102 未加载
评论 #40712151 未加载
评论 #40712312 未加载
评论 #40715741 未加载
jauntywundrkind11 个月前
Patrick&#x27;s &amp; a number of other Pirate Party seats were lost in the last EU elections. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;stackdiary.com&#x2F;patrick-breyer-and-pirate-party-lose-eu-parliament-seats&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;stackdiary.com&#x2F;patrick-breyer-and-pirate-party-lose-...</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40631517">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40631517</a><p>It&#x27;s going to be awful not having Patrick Breyer reporting these activities.
评论 #40715856 未加载
nikolay11 个月前
I think the government is more reasonable than the private corporations. As an example, I got suspended by Facebook yesterday with nobody to contact. All my friends from school, relatives, and former coworkers are gone - with most of them I was connected only via Facebook. All my messages in Facebook Messenger groups have been deleted! Everything that I ever posted, shared, or reacted to - gone! With no recourse - all at the mercy of some 20-year-old reviewer. Yeah, the government sucks, but private corporations suck much more! At least I can complain to the government and talk to real people!<p>I know there are alternatives to Facebook - I&#x27;ve pitched all of them to my friends, but people my age are still only on Facebook.
评论 #40715021 未加载
pera11 个月前
The proposal leaked a few weeks ago[1] is extremely vague on this matter and does not clarify how providers should detect CSAM &quot;prior to transmission&quot;. Is anyone aware of any sort of scanning technology that can be implemented purely on the client side? Note that the leaked text says that it should be able to detect known and <i>new</i> abuse material.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cdn.netzpolitik.org&#x2F;wp-upload&#x2F;2024&#x2F;05&#x2F;2024-05-28_Council_Presidency_LEWP_CSAR_Compromise-texts_9093.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cdn.netzpolitik.org&#x2F;wp-upload&#x2F;2024&#x2F;05&#x2F;2024-05-28_Cou...</a>
评论 #40711996 未加载
评论 #40712704 未加载
mellosouls11 个月前
Headline is clickbait nonsense. Nothing is being greenlighted.<p>Here&#x27;s the only relevant section, which links to an article [1] that says only that discussion will continue on the 19th June:<p><i>According to documents leaked by netzpolitik.org, the COREPER 2 meeting in which they will put it [compromise proposal] to a vote will already take place on Wednesday, 19 June.</i><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;netzpolitik.org&#x2F;2024&#x2F;anlasslose-massenueberwachung-frankreich-wackelt-in-der-ablehnung-der-chatkontrolle" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;netzpolitik.org&#x2F;2024&#x2F;anlasslose-massenueberwachung-f...</a>
评论 #40714718 未加载
worldsayshi11 个月前
How is VPN supposed to work? How are internet banks supposed to operate? All security will go out the window? Backdoors everywhere?<p>Will TLS have to be redone with a third snooping party in the mix? Is that what we&#x27;re going for here?
评论 #40715283 未加载
评论 #40712015 未加载
评论 #40712970 未加载
ls61211 个月前
It will be very interesting to see the responses of WhatsApp and Apple if this moves forward. Do their commitments to E2EE mean anything or not. Will iMessage and WhatsApp leave the EU or not. That would be extremely telling as to the actual quality of the security guarantees they purport to provide.
评论 #40712721 未加载
评论 #40712794 未加载
Lichtso11 个月前
Already was somewhat degraded by the EU parliament:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;proton.me&#x2F;blog&#x2F;eu-parliament-chat-control" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;proton.me&#x2F;blog&#x2F;eu-parliament-chat-control</a>
评论 #40711339 未加载
评论 #40711473 未加载
评论 #40711357 未加载
737373737311 个月前
I&#x27;d like to hear from actual law enforcement personnel why&#x2F;if violating my constitutional rights this way is actually necessary, specifically.
KoolKat2311 个月前
This whole thing stinks.<p>The relentless push, I feel may mean some American contractors are demanding their pound of flesh.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mullvad.net&#x2F;en&#x2F;why-privacy-matters&#x2F;going-dark" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mullvad.net&#x2F;en&#x2F;why-privacy-matters&#x2F;going-dark</a><p>They should be checking the bank statements of those on the EU payroll, and who are relentlessly pushing this. Make sure everything is above board.
评论 #40728121 未加载
moffkalast11 个月前
&gt; Only Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria and Poland are relatively clear that they will not support the proposal, but this is not sufficient for a “blocking minority”.<p>Ahem what? Last I checked any EU country can veto anything on its own.<p>&gt; Belgian EU Council presidency<p>It&#x27;s Council of the EU, not EU Council, that&#x27;s the heads of state who don&#x27;t have any legislative role. But the Council only does inter-country treaties, how is this even their thing?
评论 #40711667 未加载
评论 #40711744 未加载
Sayrus11 个月前
I can see how that would be implemented for WhatsApp and other apps from large companies. But how would that work in practice for applications like Matrix where clients are not controlled by the server operator nor the server developer?<p>Some questions I have from reading Patrick&#x27;s website:<p>- How do you even ensure a client is actually self-reporting? On-device attestation doesn&#x27;t really work.<p>- As a provider of E2EE chats, should the client report to you or to a third-party (Who?)? If the client reports to you, you are now possessing CSAM. Since even possession of CSAM is illegal, how does that work?<p>- If a photo are flagged, will it appear in a GDPR access request?
评论 #40713065 未加载
throwawayfear11 个月前
EU continues its descent into an authoritarian surveillance state. I hope all the EU netizens wake up and realize how much more control the EU has been exerting over its citizens since the pandemic.
评论 #40712111 未加载
Kim_Bruning11 个月前
wasn&#x27;t there a specific lobbying group pushing for this kind of legislation in some places (connected to the makers of software for this type of scanning)?
评论 #40713977 未加载
sharpshadow11 个月前
Once implemented it would be just a matter of time until they advance the features of this with image scanning and of course active actions like taking control over your device with a warrant obtained digitally.
Benjaminkleine11 个月前
Do you think that Discord will leave the european union if chatcontrol pass ?
seydor11 个月前
Good, our children can now sleep safe. Emphasis on sleep
评论 #40711893 未加载
quantum_state11 个月前
Are these guys so unimaginative that they ended up taking a page from the playbook of authoritarian regimes?
orasiscore11 个月前
It will really happen. And it will happen fast
butz11 个月前
In addition to usual communication, everyone should just start spamming as much as possible of &quot;content&quot; generated with GenAI. Good luck sorting through all that nonsense.