TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

I shrink 10x every 21s until I'm an atom – The Micro Universe [video]

5 点作者 disago11 个月前

2 条评论

mncharity11 个月前
As an alternative to those steps of 10x, one can do 1000x steps. Real world, micro-world, nano-world, etc. Easier to remember, but harder to then work in.<p>If I ask you how big a cup is, you&#x27;re unlikely to handwave a thimble, or a trash bin - you&#x27;ve handled cups, and they&#x27;re familiar. At 1000x zoom, that red blood cell is sized like a red M&amp;M candy (though they&#x27;re really barely-tinted clear). Familiar, memorable, finger-nail sized - 10-ish mumble meters. Not millimeters (wouldn&#x27;t fit in your arm), not nanometers (too small), must be micrometers. A 10 um candy - munch, munch. Table salt is a cardboard box, etc. With 10x steps, an object appears at a variety of sizes, so that familiarity anchor is absent. But a downside of 1000x, is object sizes can be inconvenient. A public bus appears as either actual-bus sized (real world), or grain-of-rice size (meter-world) - neither great for drawing a sketch. So 1000x is nice to remember object sizes and their relationships, but then you&#x27;ll often need some other scaling.<p>If you&#x27;re really interested in the topic, I did a page with some videos, but I&#x27;m afraid I&#x27;ve let it fall off the web. Internet Archive has it, but the page is <i>very</i> heavy and slow to load (wasn&#x27;t intended to be public), so please be gentle with them. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20221007220513&#x2F;clarifyscience.info&#x2F;part&#x2F;Atoms" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20221007220513&#x2F;clarifyscience.in...</a>
gdevenyi11 个月前
A redo of a classic, the powers of 10 <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;0fKBhvDjuy0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;0fKBhvDjuy0</a>