The Supreme Court Decided the SEC Has Too Much Power

I thought this was the right call. It reminded me a lot about the arbitration requirement that a lot of employers and companies force people into.<p>The SEC can bring an accusation against someone, no question, but then to require them to go through the internal administrative process without judicial recourse, just seemed wrong. It&#x27;s unfair. In the same way that would be unfair to say that you can&#x27;t sue your employer, you have to go through arbitration.<p>Both forced arbitration and federal in-house courts have the same goal: to stack the deck against the person at question.

This is a serious question, I&#x27;m not trying to score partisan points, but given what we know about gifts given to Justice Thomas, why should I believe this is an unbiased interpretation of the law and constitution?<p>Note that the SCOTUS ethics rules are loose enough that maybe all other justices are also accepting the same kinds of gifts Thomas has.<p>I, for one, do not have the access to a Justice&#x27;s ear that Harlan Crow has.