I want to see charges levied against some specific individuals, not an amorphous corporation, in order to drive actual changes to individual’s behavior within said corporation.<p>The Chief Project Engineer, Michael Teal, would seem to be an appropriate person to be charged. It was his responsibility as the CPE to oversee the safe design and testing of the MAX. It was his responsibility to ensure that adequate engineering processes and resources were in place to assess the safety and certification impact of design changes that occurred as the design matured, in accordance with federal law. (14 CFR §21.93 if you care. Mr. Teal apparently did not.) It was his physical signature on the FAA form 8110-12 Application for Type Certificate that affirmed that all the data provided to the FAA to support certification was true and correct, and it apparently was not. If the Federal Government was defrauded, that would the smoking gun to indicate whodunnit.<p><a href="https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Form/8110-12_20240206.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Form/8110-12_20240...</a><p>If you want a laugh, just read the transcript of his testimony before Congress. In my opinion, his answers provide clear evidence of his dereliction of duty.<p>Insipid local media coverage: <a href="https://archive.is/fPy0p" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/fPy0p</a><p>The real meat: <a href="https://democrats-transportation.house.gov/imo/media/doc/FINAL%20Michael%20Teal%20(Boeing)%20Transcript%20and%20Exhibits%20and%20Attachment%20(9.9.20).pdf" rel="nofollow">https://democrats-transportation.house.gov/imo/media/doc/FIN...</a>