TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ChatGPT's much-heralded Mac app was storing conversations as plain text

34 点作者 pulisse11 个月前

6 条评论

__jonas11 个月前
Weird headline, I don’t think “plain text” is the issue here, it’s rather that they opted out of storing data in a location protected by macOS app sandboxing, which is a little odd from how I understand, but not terribly uncommon.<p>I would absolutely never expect an App to encrypt data it stores locally on my computer, would be kinda nice if they would make use of the built-in file access protections macOS has though.
评论 #40887199 未加载
ilrwbwrkhv11 个月前
This is a pointless hit piece. There is no expectation of encrypted data storage for a desktop app. Now if they were not keeping data safely on their servers, now that&#x27;s another matter.
buffington11 个月前
Honest question from someone who isn&#x27;t an expert: why would they need to encrypt that data on my machine?<p>If the concern is that someone might gain access to my computer and see unencrypted things, what about all of the other things on my machine that aren&#x27;t encrypted?
评论 #40887205 未加载
评论 #40887479 未加载
meisel11 个月前
How uncommon is it for apps to store sensitive data in this way? It wouldn’t surprise me if this is a pretty common, albeit non-ideal, practice. For example, where does chrome store browsing history data?
评论 #40886615 未加载
评论 #40888052 未加载
jug11 个月前
Don&#x27;t rely on apps to enforce encrypted data at rest if you&#x27;re dealing with local data that would lead into problems if e.g. your laptop is stolen.<p>This is already a solved problem with FileWarden, BitLocker, LUKS etc. and commonly enforced in corporate environments through group policies too...
评论 #40887631 未加载
redserk11 个月前
ArsTechnica has been resorting to increasingly alarmist headlines to the point where many articles should be regarded as spam as they don&#x27;t serve to inform nor provoke any meaningful discussion.<p>Their selection of reporting over the last two years has been centered around pieces that do great for flamebait comment sections across several sites, not much for reasonable discourse.<p>As far as the concerns raised here, my browser history is <i>substantially</i> more sensitive and is in the clear.