TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Fabric is an open-source framework for augmenting humans using AI

137 点作者 kristianpaul10 个月前

15 条评论

nyokodo10 个月前
&gt; We believe the purpose of technology is to help humans flourish, so when we talk about AI we start with the human problems we want to solve.<p>This is something missing from the discussion around AI. There is fatalism or skepticism about AI capabilities vs human usefulness but very little positive philosophy about using AI to augment human capabilities rather than replace them. Even if automating everything were possible it doesn’t mean we need to and I’d argue that we should not want to.
评论 #40894123 未加载
评论 #40896080 未加载
评论 #40894536 未加载
评论 #40895013 未加载
bugglebeetle10 个月前
I read the entirety of the README for this and have no idea how this is useful aside from as a prompt DB. Like almost every AI library, it looks like a bunch of gestures in the direction of various hype things that don’t work (e.g. agents).
评论 #40897692 未加载
QuiDortDine10 个月前
Looking at the facts and references sections is an exercise in absurdity: by and large, they contain neither objective facts nor credible references. Until the thing can automatically fact-check it is useless, once it does I suspect it will become useless, as knowing what information to trust is most of the problem when trying to gain wisdom from something.
评论 #40894844 未加载
bluelightning2k10 个月前
I&#x27;m an &quot;AI engineer&quot; as I&#x27;ve seen others loftily describe it: meaning a traditional full stack who works on an AI first code base. I am a heavy user of the OpenAI and Gemini APIs... But I just don&#x27;t understand what purpose these &quot;AI frameworks&quot; solve. It&#x27;s almost to the point where I feel stupid for just not getting it.<p>You write words. Merge your context in. What possible need is there for any library?
评论 #40895288 未加载
评论 #40897665 未加载
评论 #40894991 未加载
评论 #40895611 未加载
评论 #40895699 未加载
rcarmo10 个月前
The nice thing about this is that it’s all CLI-based. Zero chat, zero web UIs, all UNIX-like composable patterns.
评论 #40894732 未加载
microbass10 个月前
I&#x27;m looking forward to the Go rewrite. Purely so it&#x27;s less of a pain to declaratively install, and I can work it into my workflow.
评论 #40893204 未加载
efilife10 个月前
Cool. Let&#x27;s take a well-known word <i>prompt</i> and rebrand it to <i>pattern</i> for no reason whatsoever, other than confusion. I know programmers love fancy labels but this is just forced
zersiax10 个月前
Honestly this looks cool but setting it up is a bit much. Like... I think the idea of this is cool, but by the time I&#x27;ve done all this setup I&#x27;ve more than likely forgotten what it is I was trying to do to begin with, and even when most of it&#x27;s already installed I need to make sure several things are running etc. before this becomes essentially a link in the chain. That feels to me like it&#x27;s going against the ease of integration the project is meant to facilitate a tiny bit. Like somebody else already stated in this thread, having a bit more of a ready-to-go solution, stick it in docker if you must, would probably help here.
评论 #40894691 未加载
评论 #40897698 未加载
blooalien10 个月前
d0mine [0] already mentioned this [1] (and was apparently downvoted to oblivion for saying it), but there&#x27;s already another Python project named Fabric that&#x27;s been around quite a while now. [2,3] Downvote me too if you like, but it&#x27;s not gonna change the fact that there&#x27;s <i>already</i> a project using that name.<p>- [0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;user?id=d0mine">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;user?id=d0mine</a><p>- [1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40893147">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40893147</a><p>- [2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pypi.org&#x2F;project&#x2F;fabric&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pypi.org&#x2F;project&#x2F;fabric&#x2F;</a><p>- [3]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fabfile.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fabfile.org&#x2F;</a>
评论 #40895377 未加载
dhalucario10 个月前
Can we not use the name of my favorite minecraft modloader for some AI project? Thanks.
worstspotgain10 个月前
Small AI boats sail a rough sea in search of the new world. They can sink, never find land, or get sherlocked by massive frigates if they do.<p>Everyone knows it would be better to fly, i.e. go up one layer and build generic public infra instead. But then they just float off into the obligatory-xkcd-verse: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;927&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;927&#x2F;</a>
评论 #40897138 未加载
walterbell10 个月前
Alan Kay on &quot;AI&quot;, human augmentation and Doug Engelbart, June 2024, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40868478">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40868478</a><p><pre><code> One big distinction in the 1962 time period is that they thought of “machine intelligence” as being a kind of complimentary set of thinking tools that could be “symbiotic” to how humans were able to think. They were not at all thinking about something like a slave or a major domo, but something more like a research assistant or a “Memex” (the latter was a big influence on Doug’s thinking). In the very late 60s the “official AI researchers” started to think that something like “intelligent Greek slaves” were needed for the “Romans” (Americans), and became rivals to Doug’s notion of elevating human thinking rather than just elevating power. This was a bad idea then … and it’s a bad idea today.</code></pre>
评论 #40895677 未加载
评论 #40895701 未加载
d0mine10 个月前
There is Fabric Python library to execute shell commands remotely over SSH <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pypi.org&#x2F;project&#x2F;fabric&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pypi.org&#x2F;project&#x2F;fabric&#x2F;</a>
评论 #40893271 未加载
ryanmerket10 个月前
When influencers code.
评论 #40897706 未加载
评论 #40895697 未加载
teruakohatu10 个月前
I vouched for this post. Not sure why it or previous submissions were dead. Seems interesting.
评论 #40893877 未加载